philinux wrote:
> Intrepid clean install. Just transferred files with gthumb and the timestamps
> are not preserved. However copying with nautilus, while painfully slow keeps
> the correct timestamps.
> Canon G5 camera. And it gets mounted correclty.
>
>
Now I see why Sebastian was having such
Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> why did you open the other bug on firefox if you think that's not a
> firefox issue?
>
>
It can't be opened as a Nautilus problem. All your previous arguments
were that it must be something other than Nautilus. I'm unfamiliar with
the process of opening a new bug so
Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> nautilus can have several issues, why do you insist to want to use this
> code issue which was a libglib bug and has been fixed now? bug #247980
> seems to describe this one so you should rather comment on this one, not
> sure why the firefox maintainer didn't reply but I
Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> the bug you are commenting on was an issue about nautilus standard
> copies, no about photos, not about firefox, and it has been fixed. if
> you have an another issue open a new bug as it has been done for the
> photo copies timestamp issue
>
>
And If I do open one it w
Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> the issue is not a lack of interest but a lack of manpower, there is
> thousand bugs opened and only a small team to work on those, the photo
> issue is a different one and seems to be a libgphoto one, see bug #49906
> for example, the issue is not new in hardy
>
>
Your
Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> the issue is not a lack of interest but a lack of manpower, there is
> thousand bugs opened and only a small team to work on those, the photo
> issue is a different one and seems to be a libgphoto one, see bug #49906
> for example, the issue is not new in hardy
>
>
Agai
philinux wrote:
> I've raised a bug for the camera issue. Bug 242647.
>
> But it doesn't seem to have had any attention. I had to buy a card
> reader and use cp.
>
>
Yes, there's a core interest here and any thing outside of that core is
disregarded. I actually found a separate Firefox add-on
On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 3:33 PM, kpoole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My comment wasn't just about the camera issue. I'be found the same
> change in behavior when copying a file from Firefox to the desktop or a
> folder.
>
> But, give me a suggestion then. Do I open a bug with the Firefox people
Great! Thanks for your commitment, Sebastien!
** Attachment added: "unnamed"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/15265798/unnamed
--
Nautilus not preserving timestamps
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/215499
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscr
