It's still relevant because Grub2 is not installed automatically on
upgrade from Jaunty.
2009/10/29 parker :
> Ok It seems to me that this is irrelevant at this point as all new
> releases of Ubuntu will use grub2. It's a pain in the ass, but it is
> what is. "Make a change and call it progress" A
Ok It seems to me that this is irrelevant at this point as all new
releases of Ubuntu will use grub2. It's a pain in the ass, but it is
what is. "Make a change and call it progress" All I want a boot loader
to do is load the OS I want and the latest kernels and then leave me
alone. But the deve
2009/10/29 Steve Langasek :
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 08:44:57AM -, Przemysław Kulczycki wrote:
>> Same thing after upgrading from Jaunty to Karmic. Update-grub fails to
>> update menu.lst after I chose to keep my version of menu.lst during the
>> upgrade.
>
> If you chose to keep your version
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 08:44:57AM -, Przemysław Kulczycki wrote:
> Same thing after upgrading from Jaunty to Karmic. Update-grub fails to
> update menu.lst after I chose to keep my version of menu.lst during the
> upgrade.
If you chose to keep your version of menu.lst, this is not a "failure"
When I had this problem using 'legacy grub' because I didn't accept
'install maintainer's version' I simply removed grub/menu.lst. When I
rebooted it created a new menu.lst with the updated kernels.
Now I'm using grub2 which presents a whole new set of problems.
Good luck,
Paco
Przemysław Kulc
I don't disagree that this is serious, but unfortunately the old
update-grub is such a mess at this point that it's nearly certain that
any attempts to fix problems will make something else worse. We're
replacing the old update-grub system with grub2's entirely rewritten
version in karmic; I have s
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 06:01:17AM -, JacobSteelsmith wrote:
> Thanks for the reply. I run only one operating system on this machine
> and I do not have a separate boot partition:
> ja...@jakes-desktop:~$ df -h
> FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on
> /dev/md0 22
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 05:36:27AM -, JacobSteelsmith wrote:
> I removed linux-image-2.6.24-22-generic and got the same prompt about
> menu.lst. I chose to keep the maintainers version. I rebooted with the
> same results. In fact, I was able to boot to the 2.6.24-22 kernel even
> though I remov
Thanks for this . Will try as soon as possible.
--
Francis
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 6:42 PM, felix.rommel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Have located my problem:
>
> NEVER put anything manually into the
>
> BEGIN AUTOMAGIC KERNELS LIST
>
> section. Otherwise menu.lst will grow bigger and bigg
