OpenAL Soft 1.10 is just released
--
libopenal needs replacement
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194919
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/ma
alfredio wrote:
> Update:
> Cristian, I managed to build your packages locally, by using dget and
> debuild. Still I was not able to sign them with your private key ;-)
>
> OpenAL Soft is up, hacked and running right now :-D
>
Great to know my worked helped somebody. I personally, don't like my
Andres Mejia wrote:
> Just so you know, this is being worked on in Debian. I'm waiting for someone
> to upload the openal-soft packages to the archive. You can try them out
> yourself.
> - dget
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/openal-soft/openal-soft_1.3.253-1~experimental0.dsc
Th
That's the truth right there
** Attachment added: "unnamed"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12946785/unnamed
--
libopenal needs replacement
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194919
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubu
Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> Cristian KLEIN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Please do. Nobody responded to my mail to pkg-games-devel@ since 25
>> march.
>
> I had a private talk about this with a member of the games team. The
> decision is not that easy, so nobody had enough courage up to now to
>
Cristian KLEIN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Please do. Nobody responded to my mail to pkg-games-devel@ since 25
> march.
I had a private talk about this with a member of the games team. The
decision is not that easy, so nobody had enough courage up to now to
talk about this in public, but there
Scott Kitterman wrote:
> I encourage you to take your passion to Debian and get it done there so
> both distros benifit. We can facilitate that if needed.
Please do. Nobody responded to my mail to pkg-games-devel@ since 25
march.
--
libopenal needs replacement
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1
People often say things like that thinking it will motivate developers to
do something. In truth it's rather more likely to have the opposite effect.
Each Ubuntu release requires a balance between new features and risk. We
are currently dealing with an unfortunate volume of late toolchain and
This is the kind of decision that makes people go back to Windows.
--
libopenal needs replacement
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194919
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubunt
Cristian KLEIN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I know it is a gross hack, but I was 100% sure that ubuntu-release would not
> like to change to a new package this late in the release cycle. Therefore, I
> have resorted to this solution which would:
So how about providing it in a PPA?
> d) hopefu
StefanPotyra wrote:
> Ok, I've taken a look at the package now.
>
> I'm inclined to reject this bug for the following reasons: Modifying
> openal to depend on the openal library package or openal-soft is a gross
> hack which contradicts everything library packages should adhere to. The
> only way
There's no need to test any more games, they all use the same version and
the difference is obvious. Just replace it already.
--
libopenal needs replacement
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194919
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ub
Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> Cristian KLEIN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> I created a new package called libopenal0a-soft, with the latest version
>> of OpenAL. I renamed the old package libopenal0a to libopenal0a-
>> creative, and created a metapackage libopenal0a which depends on either
>> one o
Cristian KLEIN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I created a new package called libopenal0a-soft, with the latest version
> of OpenAL. I renamed the old package libopenal0a to libopenal0a-
> creative, and created a metapackage libopenal0a which depends on either
> one of them. Thus, no Ubuntu packages
14 matches
Mail list logo
