Thanks very much for the analysis, Thomas!
> There remain riddles:
> Why does the grub-mkrescue ISO not boot on V14IIL ?
> (I still wonder which other ISOs boot on that machine.)
> Why did the old Ubuntu ISOs with their invalid GPT boot on sudodus' V130
> whereas a similarly invalid GPT did not
On Thu, Oct 08, 2020 at 06:13:56PM -, sudodus wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
> I tried to make a minimal grub iso file, but failed. After installing
> xorriso too, I had the following error:
> $ sudo grub-mkrescue -o output.iso minimal
> grub-mkrescue: error: `mformat` invocation failed
> .
> I tried i
On Thu, Oct 08, 2020 at 01:10:12PM -, sudodus wrote:
> @ Steve Langasek (vorlon),
> Would you be able to ask the manufacturer, either Lenovo or InsydeH2O,
> what they are looking for in their "Linpus Lite" boot option (in order
> to boot in UEFI mode)?
Potentially, but this would take some ti
On Thu, Oct 08, 2020 at 01:35:08PM -, sudodus wrote:
> So you want us to test only USB boot drives with the live system
> *cloned* from the iso file?
Yes, please.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launch
Hi Thomas,
On Thu, Oct 08, 2020 at 06:56:47AM -, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> so for now -partition_offset 16 is not to blame ?
Appears not.
> The only tangible report was back in 2011 about a Macbook Pro
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-cd/2011/04/msg00029.html
> with decisive test in
> htt
On Sun, Oct 04, 2020 at 01:14:43PM -, Marcos Nascimento wrote:
> In previous version images the /isolinux folder existed. Isn't it the
> case that it's necessary for systems that are experiencing problems?
No. The isolinux directory is an internal implementation detail of using
the isolinux b
On Fri, Oct 02, 2020 at 06:56:45PM -, sudodus wrote:
> When cloned, it behaved like before: the Lenovo V130 does not boot in
> UEFI mode, but my other computers (tested in a Dell Precision M4800) are
> happy to boot
And is this a regression vs 20.04? I've lost track.
--
You received this bu
@all
Could you please systemize all your findings on public Google
Spreadsheet?
Reading whole thread everytime is very difficult to track progress or
regress.
I would recommend the following workflow: test ISO, add result to created
table, add concluding comment here.
--
You received this bug n
On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 08:21:03AM -, sudodus wrote:
> I can find today's groovy iso files of lubuntu and xubuntu. But there
> are no
> groovy-desktop-amd64.iso
> groovy-desktop-amd64.iso.zsync
> files (only arm files) for Ubuntu Desktop. How come?
Sorry, I failed to notice that the amd64 bu
On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 09:10:33AM -, sudodus wrote:
> I notice another difference: A third partition is created (during the
> boot process), but no file system is recognized by lsblk -f, and it is
> not used for logging (as we are used to from Focal and previous versions
> of Groovy). Is this
10 matches
Mail list logo
