On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 2:35 PM Scott Moser
wrote:
> this seemed to "just work" for me.
> http://paste.ubuntu.com/p/93dWDPZfZT/
Ah, I didn't check that there was an existing ubuntu/devel branch. Sorry.
I've pushed a MR here:
https://code.launchpad.net/~raharper/cloud-utils/+git/cloud-utils/
On Thu, 7 Nov 2019 at 20:05, Scott Moser wrote:
>
> > > So that means we have this sequence of events:
> > > a.) growpart change partition table
> > > b.) growpart call partx
> > > c.) udev created and events being processed
>
> > That is not true. whilst sfdisk is deleting, creating, finishing
On Thu, 7 Nov 2019 at 17:50, Ryan Harper <1834...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote:
>
> @ddstreet
>
> Yes, settle does not help.
>
> Re-triggering udevadm trigger --action=add /sys/class/block/sda
>
> Would re-run all of them after the partition change has occurred, which
> is what I'm currently suggestin
On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 2:41 PM Dan Streetman
wrote:
> > Issuing a second
> > trigger will repeat this.
> > IMO, that's a non-zero amount of time that slows the boot down, so I'd
> like
> > to avoid that.
>
> systemd-udev-trigger.serivce retriggers *everything* at boot (except in
>
an unprivileged
On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 11:30 AM Dimitri John Ledkov
wrote:
> > So that means we have this sequence of events:
> > a.) growpart change partition table
> > b.) growpart call partx
> > c.) udev created and events being processed
>
> That is not true. whilst sfdisk is deleting, creating, finishing
On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 1:30 PM Dan Streetman
wrote:
> > Yes, settle does not help.
>
> Well, I didn't suggest just to settle ;-)
>
Sorry; long bug thread.
> > I'm currently suggesting as a heavy-handed workaround.
>
> I don't really see why you think this is heavy-handed, but I must be
> missi
On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 03:17:10PM -, Scott Moser wrote:
> If there is a race, or a need to wait, it almost certainly is in cloud-
> utils (growpart).
I would still like us to get a systemd/kernel person to take a look at
this, because I think that the race is somewhere further down than
cloud
On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 08:58:46AM -, Tobias Koch wrote:
> > (Odds are that whatever causes it to be recreated later in boot would be
> > blocked by cloud-init waiting.)
>
> But that's not happening. The instance does boot normally, the only
> service degraded is cloud-init and there is no sig
On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 4:05 AM Tobias Koch <1834...@bugs.launchpad.net>
wrote:
> > (Odds are that whatever causes it to be recreated later in boot would be
> > blocked by cloud-init waiting.)
>
> But that's not happening. The instance does boot normally, the only
> service degraded is cloud-init
On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 08:23:06PM -, Tobias Koch wrote:
> I may be missing the point, but the symlink in question is eventually
> recreated, does that tell us anything? This here
Yes, this is more supporting evidence that this is a race condition; the
state of the system both before and some
On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 10:21 AM Dan Watkins
wrote:
> Looking at the comment timestamps, Dan probably didn't see my comment,
> but to reiterate: all the events we expect to be processed _are_
> processed, the issue is that when they are processed they don't always
> end up with the correct partit
On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 10:00 AM Dan Streetman
wrote:
> > Dan had put a udevadm settle in this spot like so
> >
> > def get_size(filename)
> >util.subp(['udevadm', 'settle'])
> >os.open()
>
> if you know you've just changed (e.g.) /dev/sda, possibly its kernel-
> generated udev events
12 matches
Mail list logo
