On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 08:58:45PM -, Guo, Liang Chang wrote:
> Thank you very much, Steve.
> > ... but lintian does not support analyzing such a package using the
> appropriate rules.
> Then, Ubuntu community should not reject a package destined for /opt,
> based on lintian's analysis output
Le 2015-09-23 19:18, Guo, Liang Chang a écrit :
> Thank you Mathieu.
> Q: "Would it be possible to recompile just to replace /var/perf/pm with
> /opt/ibm/pm? "
> A: Although technically possible, it might raise questions on the viability
> of PM-Ubuntu project:
>1) For a FHS-compliant system
Right, and I do agree that we don't want it to be part of the ISO at the
moment.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1448092
Title:
[needs-packaging] ibmpmlinux
To manage notifications ab
