Quoting bugproxy (bugpr...@us.ibm.com):
> --- Comment From preeti.mur...@in.ibm.com 2015-04-20 03:20 EDT---
> Hi,
>
> We want cgroups to be mounted *without* the cpuset controller.
>
> >From your conversation I could make out the following:
>
> 1. LXC does not have a hard requirement on
> But I'm a bit worried, doesn't not mounting cpuset mean that containers,
> for instance, wouldn't work so well?
You just won't be able to lock containers to cpusets.
> That is, even if cgmanager doesn't mount the cpuset cgroup, if
> *anything* mounts it, processes in that cgroup tree will exper
> Does 15.04 ship with the legacy hierarchy on by default, I'm assuming it
> does to minimize regressions? Sort of annoying to have a cgmanager flag
> that only should apply if legacy is in-use?
Legacy will be in use for a long time, because the unified hierarchy
breaks a great deal of existing so
