I can confirm this output (notably failing to initialize dbus, and the
NameErrors
--phix
On 9/20/07, ThinkpadUBUNTU <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I am afraid none of the above allowed the upgrade to run on my system -
>
> here is the output
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo touch -t 19700101
> /
On Mon, September 10, 2007 4:07 am, Michael Vogt wrote:
> I put packages online at:
>
> deb http://people.ubuntu.com/~mvo/update-manager /
>
> Please give them a go.
>
> Thanks,
Thank *you*. Seems to work just great, except that running
sudo update-manager -d, I needed to hit "Check" before the
n
Should we be checking for corrupt meta release info as well as 0
length files here?
Is it that bad to download the meta release file every time when -d is
passed?
On 9/7/07, schnollk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to report what happend here[1]:
>
> 1. procedure as suggested href="https:/
On Thu, September 6, 2007 4:33 pm, Anders wrote:
> I tried
> $ sudo touch -t 19700101 /var/lib/update-manager/meta-release
> $ update-manager -d
> to no avail.
Try using sudo for both commands. Or try:
$ rm ~/.update-manager-core/meta-release
$ update-manager -d
--
update-manager cannot fi
On Tue, August 28, 2007 3:17 am, Martin Pool wrote:
> The recipe give by Daniel Moyne of just touching the file to the epoch
> does not work for me, neither does the one from ysth.
Touching the file may not work if you don't sudo update-manager.
I'd like to know what you tried.
> mvo's patch doe
On Mon, 2007-08-27 at 18:22 +, brettalton wrote:
> Has the patch been uploaded to the repositories? I'm not sure how to
> merg a .diff file.
>
sudo
patch /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/UpdateManager/Core/MetaRelease.py
u-m.diff should do it (I hope).
--
Bruce Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
