That's bug #604390.
On 07/11/2010 05:09 PM, Michael Jones wrote:
> Are there any plans to upgrade to Eclipse 3.6? Should that be a new bug?
>
--
Upgrade to Eclipse 3.5.0
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123064
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is su
Am Samstag, den 10.10.2009, 22:40 + schrieb James Tait:
> Judging by the changelog for Eclipse in Ubuntu Karmic, it's about to go
> into production:
Yes, you are right. We use a current eclipse-build svn checkout to build
eclipse 3.5.1.
> I'd love to contribute a package, but frankly I wouldn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
pkt wrote:
> WRT inclusion of eclipse in debian / ubuntu a promising direction is
> to utilize the eclipse-build system developed as part of the linux tools
> project upstream @ eclipse.org
>
> I think this project already has its first (alpha sort of
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 7:58 PM, Chris Aniszczyk wrote:
> The project plan for Eclipse 3.6 is here:
>
> http://www.eclipse.org/projects/project-plan.php?projectid=eclipse
>
> This is for the Eclipse platform though. Eclipse is a large place and
> there are many projects within Eclipse that have th
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 9:57 PM, aporter wrote:
> Yes thanks very much for eclipse 3.4 in karmic.
>
> I have to ask, why does the "eclipse-platform" package depend on the
> "firefox" package?
Eclipse uses a particular version of xulrunner for various functions
e.g., to display the welcome page.
-
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 2:11 PM, Vincenzo Ciancia wrote:
> Where is the packege? I mean it's not here:
>
> http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?keywords=eclipse&searchon=names&suite=karmic§ion=all
>
> I think that if 3.4 was uploaded then the path is clean to have eclipse
> 3.5 or 3.5+1 in karmic+1 is
Why not be thankful?
On 6/29/09, karl michael wrote:
> why not 3.5?
>
> --
> Upgrade to Eclipse 3.5.0
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123064
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>
> Status in “eclipse” package in Ubuntu: Confirmed
> Status in “e
Btw, some things the eclipse team could do to make packagers' lives easier
and increase the chances for an eclipse version that meets debian's high
freedom/quality standards:
* Test your code with openjdk.
* Assist with building eclipse in a headless manner from the command-line.
(this practically
The problem is that, for the most part, there is no debian/ubuntu
eclipse team.
There is mostly just individuals right now, many with almost no free time
(e.g., I don't even use eclipse nowadays).
Removing the ancient 3.2 version might help bring a few more interested
developers to assist towards
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 4:50 PM, Vincenzo Ciancia wrote:
> I think the request to remove eclipse from ubuntu is extremely smart. If
> eclipse will want to be in ubuntu they'll need to cooperate themselves,
> as ubuntu clearly does not have enough man power. On the other hand,
> keeping ecliplse 3.2
10 matches
Mail list logo
