On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 9:30 PM, Paul Gevers wrote:
> On 29-04-14 21:13, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
>> Anyway, I don't like too much putting ubuntu-specific diffs in a
>> debian package that can't be built without further edits.
>
> I don't know if I understand what you mean here. Of course, if a patch
On 29-04-14 21:13, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> Anyway, I don't like too much putting ubuntu-specific diffs in a
> debian package that can't be built without further edits.
I don't know if I understand what you mean here. Of course, if a patch
is unmaintainable in Debian, it also doesn't make much sens
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 8:50 PM, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Ok. But having only a U/D delta in d/control is already a lot nicer than
> the current situation, AFAIAC. So let's go for that (if somebody does
> the work ;) )
I can do it, in fact doing such work in debian would be easier
Anyway, I don't like
On 29-04-14 20:39, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Mattia Rizzolo [2014-04-29 17:02 -]:
>> What's about the different build-deps?
>
> That's not generally possible, as you can't generate build-deps
> dynamically. In some cases one can use alternatives if a package is
> only present in D or U, and fall ba
Mattia Rizzolo [2014-04-29 17:02 -]:
> What's about the different build-deps?
That's not generally possible, as you can't generate build-deps
dynamically. In some cases one can use alternatives if a package is
only present in D or U, and fall back on the other one. Otherwise
there needs to be
On Apr 29, 2014 6:50 PM, "Martin Pitt" wrote:
> Right, you can do that with something like
>
> if dpkg-vendor --is ubuntu; then \
> [...]
> fi
>
> One can have a debian/patches/ubuntu.series and
> debian/patches/debian.series for that purpose.
What's about the differen
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 6:30 PM, Paul Gevers wrote:
> What I meant is that there are ways to make changes such that they only
> apply when build by Ubuntu. In that way, the necessary code is in the
> Debian package while not APPLIED in Debian. I remember having used this
> kind of logic at least in
Hello,
Paul Gevers [2014-04-29 16:30 -]:
> I remember having used this kind of logic at least in debian/rules
> file,
Right, you can do that with something like
if dpkg-vendor --is ubuntu; then \
[...]
fi
> although you would need to > search around how to do th
On 29-04-14 18:13, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 5:50 PM, Paul Gevers <1208...@bugs.launchpad.net>
> wrote:
>> It would be great if somebody could actually go through the effort of
>> creating a debdiff that we could integrate into the Debian packaging so
>> that we don't need th
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 5:50 PM, Paul Gevers <1208...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote:
> It would be great if somebody could actually go through the effort of
> creating a debdiff that we could integrate into the Debian packaging so
> that we don't need this dance in the future. This should be doable
> c
On 29-04-14 16:36, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> Here there is a debdiff from the current debian package.
>
> ** Patch added: "debdiff from debian/1.10.8-1"
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/liferea/+bug/1208776/+attachment/4100416/+files/1.10.8-1_1.10.8-1u1.debdiff
It would be great if
11 matches
Mail list logo
