** Changed in: ltsp (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Won't Fix
--
eBox 2300 boots VERY slow with Ubuntu/LTSP-5
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/97456
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu
I'm fine with that.
Jim.
Jonathan Carter wrote:
> As far as I understand from Oli's comment #20, it's already booting the
> system as fast as it possibly can with a 2.6 kernel. Since Ubuntu will
> never support a 2.4 kernel, this bug can probably be closed now?
>
--
eBox 2300 boots VERY slow w
As far as I understand from Oli's comment #20, it's already booting the
system as fast as it possibly can with a 2.6 kernel. Since Ubuntu will
never support a 2.4 kernel, this bug can probably be closed now?
--
eBox 2300 boots VERY slow with Ubuntu/LTSP-5
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/97456
You
What's the status of this bug ?
I see mention of Feisty and Gutsy which are both non-supported release.
Is there an actual bug with that thin client running on recent LTSP that
we could try to fix in LTSP ?
** Changed in: ltsp (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Incomplete
--
eBox 2300 boots
** Changed in: ltsp (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Oliver Grawert (ogra) => (unassigned)
--
eBox 2300 boots VERY slow with Ubuntu/LTSP-5
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/97456
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs maili
Oli, is the status on this bug right (In Progress)?
--
eBox 2300 boots VERY slow with Ubuntu/LTSP-5
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/97456
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubun
I'm sorry, comment #17 left me with the impression that boot-times could
be reduced to as low as ~90seconds...my mistake.
--
eBox 2300 boots VERY slow with Ubuntu/LTSP-5
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/97456
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subs
i think 3 minutes vs 5-8 minutes is an improvement ... you wont get out
much more of that hardware with a standard 2.6 kernel
--
eBox 2300 boots VERY slow with Ubuntu/LTSP-5
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/97456
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
On Ubuntu 8.04 w/ LTS 5.0.40, servicing series 2300 eBox's, default-
install boot times are still upwards of three full minutes. Comment 17
hints that improvements have been made, but I'm not seeing them - is
there something non-default which needs to be enabled and/or installed?
The most profound
That's great news. I look forward to a slicker ltsp5 in gutsy then :-)
--
eBox 2300 boots VERY slow with Ubuntu/LTSP-5
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/97456
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing l
Gavin,
it's all been done already and Ollie and Scott have made great progress
in getting the boot speed fixed.
I think they've got the boot down to about 90 seconds now, which is
quite a bit better than it was. They've still got a few tricks up their
sleeves, so I expect it to get better yet
would there be any benefit in generating bootcharts of the e2300 and
T-1220 to try and pinpoint where the slowdowns are? I put together a
short howto here:
http://www.hamilton.ie/gavinmc/edubuntu/bootchart.html
--
eBox 2300 boots VERY slow with Ubuntu/LTSP-5
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/97456
** Attachment added: "Syslog entries for a booting e2300"
http://librarian.launchpad.net/7036941/syslog.ws027
--
eBox 2300 boots VERY slow with Ubuntu/LTSP-5
https://launchpad.net/bugs/97456
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/u
** Attachment added: "Xorg log from e2300"
http://librarian.launchpad.net/7036944/Xorg.6.0.log
--
eBox 2300 boots VERY slow with Ubuntu/LTSP-5
https://launchpad.net/bugs/97456
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
** Attachment added: "xorg.conf from e2300"
http://librarian.launchpad.net/7036946/xorg.conf
--
eBox 2300 boots VERY slow with Ubuntu/LTSP-5
https://launchpad.net/bugs/97456
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
as confirmed on IRC that speeds up a bit, added to the package:
ltsp (5.0.6) feisty; urgency=low
.
* move printing back, doesnt gain us anything
* make sure the localdev scritps dont start new instaces with every ldm
restart on logout
* fix quoting in sources.list plugin
* chang
now on to the real ldm speedup:
sudo chroot /opt/ltsp/i386 apt-get remove xfonts-75dpi xfonts-100dpi
xfonts-scalable
try that one and look if that speeds up ldm
--
eBox 2300 boots VERY slow with Ubuntu/LTSP-5
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/97456
You received this bug notification because you
i went through the initscripts and moved all slowing down parts we dont
need to bring up X after the screenscript startup (localdev, printing,
sound) so that should speed up minimally to present the screen earlier
to teh user. additionally i found a stray sleep(5) command in ldm which
i dropped, th
I rebuild the chroot based on ogra's latest updates, and it managed to
shave a whopping 10 seconds off the boot time. So now, instead of 4mins
45secs, it boots in 4mins 35secs. I'd say we still have some shaving to
do.
--
eBox 2300 boots VERY slow with Ubuntu/LTSP-5
https://bugs.launchpad.net/b
Looking at the 2 syslog files (ltsp-5 vs ltsp-4.2), I found the 36
second difference at line 41. the LTSP-4.2 kernel that I compiled jumps
from 0.00 to 12.826513, while the LTSP-5 Ubuntu supplied kernel
jumps from 0.00 to 46.854847.
/me wonders why my kernel pauses only 13 seconds, while t
This is the .config file that I used to build a 2.6.20 kernel for
LTSP-4.2
I'd like to build an Ubuntu/LTSP-5 kernel using this config file.
** Attachment added: "kernel config file used to build an Ubuntu kernel for
LTSP-4.2"
http://librarian.launchpad.net/7039447/config_2.6.20-ltsp
--
eBo
I used the ubuntu kernel source for 2.6.20, and built a kernel for
LTSP-4.2. I modified the .config extensively, turning off an awful lot
of stuff that a thin client doesn't need. I probably turned off too much
stuff, but it's enough to prove that the 2.6.20 will boot with ltsp-4.2
AND, it boots f
could you also attach an xorg.conf from a running client and the
snippets of teh servers syslog that are written by the client ?
--
eBox 2300 boots VERY slow with Ubuntu/LTSP-5
https://launchpad.net/bugs/97456
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mai
** Attachment added: "contents of /proc/version on e2300 thin client"
http://librarian.launchpad.net/7036125/version
--
eBox 2300 boots VERY slow with Ubuntu/LTSP-5
https://launchpad.net/bugs/97456
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/lis
** Attachment added: "contents of /proc/cpuinfo on e2300 thin client"
http://librarian.launchpad.net/7036094/cpuinfo
--
eBox 2300 boots VERY slow with Ubuntu/LTSP-5
https://launchpad.net/bugs/97456
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/lis
** Attachment added: "Output of 'lspci -v' on e2300 thin client"
http://librarian.launchpad.net/7036119/lspci_v
--
eBox 2300 boots VERY slow with Ubuntu/LTSP-5
https://launchpad.net/bugs/97456
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo
** Attachment added: "output of 'lspci' on e2300 thin client"
http://librarian.launchpad.net/7036107/lspci
--
eBox 2300 boots VERY slow with Ubuntu/LTSP-5
https://launchpad.net/bugs/97456
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubun
27 matches
Mail list logo
