[Bug 967182] Re: Flash plugin 11.2.202.228 breaks firefox and chromium in Precise and Oneiric

2012-03-30 Thread J11
@mariageller67 Very true. (although I haven't had flash "always" breaking before) You shouldn't poke these files manually. If you must work outside package manager (again, not the best idea) it's better to keep the changes out of the system files and contain them in user directory. For flash it

[Bug 967182] Re: Flash plugin 11.2.202.228 breaks firefox and chromium in Precise and Oneiric

2012-03-30 Thread Maria Geller
I should have mentioned that anything that uses apt for installation, like apt-get or aptitude or synaptic or even the "software centre" downloads the debs into /var/cache/apt/archives. So all you need do to keep a copy of a package deb is to make a dir to hold your stuff e.g. sudo mkdir -p /usr/l

[Bug 967182] Re: Flash plugin 11.2.202.228 breaks firefox and chromium in Precise and Oneiric

2012-03-30 Thread Maria Geller
@J11 just for future reference, flash is always breaking in lunux so make sure you always keep a copy deb of the last known working version. Manually installing the way you suggest certainly works, but it is a very bad idea. You would be better making a .deb yourself. Or ... you could ditch libvdp

[Bug 967182] Re: Flash plugin 11.2.202.228 breaks firefox and chromium in Precise and Oneiric

2012-03-30 Thread J11
I installed an old version of flash player to keep using flash content until adobe releases a new version that works. I did this manually since repository doesn't have older versions and I couldn't use Synaptic's force version option. This is what I did (on Ubuntu Precise 32bit): * I Downloaded

[Bug 967182] Re: Flash plugin 11.2.202.228 breaks firefox and chromium in Precise and Oneiric

2012-03-30 Thread Maria Geller
I've discovered if you ditch libvdpau1 it works again. So the conflict seems to be with vdpau. But if you want mplayer or mplayer2 you are out of luck, cos both need libvdpau1 to run, and both have libvdpau1 as a formal dependency. And things like smplayer, gnome-mplayer &etc all depend on mplayer

[Bug 967182] Re: Flash plugin 11.2.202.228 breaks firefox and chromium in Precise and Oneiric

2012-03-29 Thread Peter
After the update flash is totally messed up. Any flash vid or app is either just a black box or doesn't show up at all. Also can't reinstall the "old" plugin version because of https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flashplugin-nonfree/+bug/968192 Oneiric, 3.0.0-17-generic i686, nvidia 173 a

[Bug 967182] Re: Flash plugin 11.2.202.228 breaks firefox and chromium in Precise and Oneiric

2012-03-29 Thread Peter
** Summary changed: - Flash plugin 11.2.202.228 breaks firefox and chromium in Precise + Flash plugin 11.2.202.228 breaks firefox and chromium in Precise and Oneiric -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchp

[Bug 967182] Re: Flash plugin 11.2.202.228 breaks firefox and chromium in Precise

2012-03-29 Thread Mankeys
I have black box after update to flash 11.2 (firefox 11.0) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/967182 Title: Flash plugin 11.2.202.228 breaks firefox and chromium in Precise To manage not

[Bug 967182] Re: Flash plugin 11.2.202.228 breaks firefox and chromium in Precise

2012-03-29 Thread J11
On my machine Firefox doesn't freeze but all I get is a black box instead of flash video. I tried to change the file permissions and copy the libflashplayer.so file to all possible locations I know and see if that does anything but all I got was plugin-container hanging. Locations I tried were:

[Bug 967182] Re: Flash plugin 11.2.202.228 breaks firefox and chromium in Precise

2012-03-28 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users. ** Changed in: adobe-flashplugin (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/967182 Ti