[Bug 963713] Re: mediatomb should not depend on www-browser

2013-10-26 Thread Justin Buser
See http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html, which clearly states that a dependancy should only be declared when a package cannot be installed and configured without it. ** Changed in: mediatomb (Ubuntu) Status: Opinion => Confirmed -- You received this bug notificat

[Bug 963713] Re: mediatomb should not depend on www-browser

2013-10-26 Thread Justin Buser
See this is the problem with Ubuntu, and one of the reasons why I and many others run Arch and other distros. Regardless of the semantics involved in the description we really need to stop treating people like idiots and shoving software down their throat. I have Google Chrome installed, which pro

[Bug 963713] Re: mediatomb should not depend on www-browser

2012-09-05 Thread Mattias Holmlund
>From "apt-cache show mediatomb" This package contains the desktop file needed to access the web ui using a system's default web browser. This package also acts as a virtual package to install all other mediatomb packages. You don't need this package on your server. You only need mediatomb- da

[Bug 963713] Re: mediatomb should not depend on www-browser

2012-09-05 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users. ** Changed in: mediatomb (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/963713 Title: m