[Bug 960334] Re: Missing dependency libxcursor1:i386

2012-03-29 Thread Sworddragon
> You are misunderstanding no-install-recommends. Policy says recommends is for packages that are not _strictly_ required, as > in the program can possibly run without them. The related part of Wine can't run without libxcursor1 because there is no excepton that uses a builtin function. This is th

[Bug 960334] Re: Missing dependency libxcursor1:i386

2012-03-28 Thread Scott Ritchie
Yes, Wine is broken on your app because you intentionally told your system to not have a component required specifically for your app. Wine can work just fine without it, it's just that Wine's animated cursor features are disabled, which are only needed on some apps (most of which don't use animat

[Bug 960334] Re: Missing dependency libxcursor1:i386

2012-03-28 Thread Sworddragon
The package isn't installed on my system because of the configuration APT::Install-Recommends 0. I like a minimalistic system and because of this there are no recommendations installed on my system. Every package is working fine except Wine. libxcursor1 provides basic functionality without Wine ca

[Bug 960334] Re: Missing dependency libxcursor1:i386

2012-03-28 Thread Scott Ritchie
it's already a recommends. It probably didn't get installed due to archive skew when you were updating (ie there was a newer version of libxcursor1:amd64 and libxcursor1:i386 in the archive, so apt only installed the former and not the latter since they need to be the same exact version) I'm not