[Bug 95256] Re: sbackup: defunct + 100% cpu usage

2007-09-21 Thread Launchpad Janitor
[Expired for sbackup (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60 days.] -- sbackup: defunct + 100% cpu usage https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/95256 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 95256] Re: sbackup: defunct + 100% cpu usage

2007-04-29 Thread Ouattara Aziz
Hi, I have studied your proposition (with libnotify) but I think it isn't possible cause Sbackupd is launched by the root . To get a notification, it seems that one has to launch a Gnome session under its ID (which is never the case ) . Anyway I think that is to be classify as a wishlist . And we

[Bug 95256] Re: sbackup: defunct + 100% cpu usage

2007-04-28 Thread Michael Wood
maybe you could use libnotify to do this -- sbackup: defunct + 100% cpu usage https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/95256 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://l

[Bug 95256] Re: sbackup: defunct + 100% cpu usage

2007-04-28 Thread Ouattara Aziz
I can understand the problem (sbackup not giving informations about its precise status at a certain time ) . But since it's in the background , how could it ? Do you think that adding a feature that permit the user to ask for sbackup status is a good solution ? As for the 100% CPU usage,