** Changed in: partman-crypto (Debian)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/945001
Title:
Erase data very slow compared to standard dd wipe
To mana
** Changed in: partman-crypto (Debian)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/945001
Title:
Erase data very slow compared to standard dd wipe
To manage notifi
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: partman-crypto (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/945001
Title
** Changed in: partman-crypto (Debian)
Status: Unknown => New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/945001
Title:
Erase data very slow compared to standard dd wipe
To manage notifica
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #678015
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=678015
** Also affects: partman-crypto (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=678015
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification be
Hi Hannes,
What hardware were you doing this test on ?
I saw similar abysmal speed running this on a debian install inside a qemu kvm
guest (bug 1035921) - and it does seem to be blockdev-wipe that's inexplicably
slow.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
B
I retract my previous comment, sorry about that. Random numbers are not
written by blockdev-wipe as I assumed.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/945001
Title:
Erase data very slow compar
I don't think the request makes much sense.
Overwriting the hard disk with random numbers (instead of zeros as proposed) is
what takes time.
However, this is an essential part of hard drive encryption and should not be
substituted by overwriting with zeros.
In short, well-encrypted data looks li
** Tags added: oneiric
** Changed in: partman-crypto (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Low
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/945001
Title:
Erase data very slow compared to standard d
