[Expired for monotone (Ubuntu Precise) because there has been no
activity for 60 days.]
** Changed in: monotone (Ubuntu Precise)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchp
[Expired for monotone (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60
days.]
** Changed in: monotone (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/9349
Debdiff attached to this comment. Unfortunately, I don't have a
"precise" system to verify compilation on.
** Attachment added: "monotone_1.0-3_to_1.0-3ubuntu1.debdiff.gz"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/monotone/+bug/934977/+attachment/2937816/+files/monotone_1.0-3_to_1.0-3ubuntu1.d
My last message didn't get a reply, so I've prepared a debdiff against
the package currently in precise. It incorporates the name clash fix, as
well as one for building with the -Werror=format-security flag which I
believe may occur under Ubuntu.
--
You received this bug notification because you
Certainly. Can you point me to an appropriate wiki page telling me
where/how to upload a revised version? From your last messafe, I assume
it should be numbered 1.0-3ubuntu1 but I've noticed different numbering
conventions on whether the fix is confirmed valid, etc.
--
You received this bug notif
Francis,
thanks for your research. I think for precise the best way to go is to
prepare a upload with the upstream commit applied, and target a new
upstream for precise+1. Do you want to go and prepare a 1.0-3ubuntu1
version?
Cheers,
Andreas
** Changed in: monotone (Ubuntu Precise)
Stat
So, the issue is apparently already fixed in upstream development by the
following commit:
https://code.monotone.ca/p/monotone/source/commit/da62cad10eda55aa233ac124273f3db4f541137a/
So either that can be used to build a patch, or if people prefer I could
have a go at getting a version with this
I've filed this bug upstream here
https://code.monotone.ca/p/monotone/issues/203/
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/934977
Title:
monotone version 1.0-3 FTBFS on i386 in precise
To mana
cf bug 935540
since glibc 2.14, the struct file_handle is taken, and applications must
no longer use it.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/934977
Title:
monotone version 1.0-3 FTBFS on
