[Bug 920436] Re: [MIR] yodl

2018-06-06 Thread Matthias Klose
closing as invalid, because we now can use build dependencies from universe ** Changed in: icmake (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid ** Changed in: yodl (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 920436] Re: [MIR] yodl

2014-08-12 Thread Felix Geyer
Another month later ... I hope doing parts of the build "offline" to avoid proper build-dependencies is not considered a permanent solution. If it is a problem to promote these two packages please consider dropping zsh from whatever seed that is pulling it into main. -- You received this bug no

[Bug 920436] Re: [MIR] yodl

2014-07-07 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
5 development cycles later, what needs to be done to approve icmake & yodl M.I.R.? zsh packaging divergence is getting harder to untangle and maintain. ** Changed in: yodl (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => New ** Changed in: icmake (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => New -- You received t

[Bug 920436] Re: [MIR] yodl

2012-03-12 Thread Matthias Klose
sorry for the delay. is there a FFe for zsh? if not, I'd like to delay this for the q-series. If there is a FFe, please consider shipping the original tarball for precise. I'll address this with the MIR team at UDS. ** Changed in: icmake (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete ** Changed in: y

[Bug 920436] Re: [MIR] yodl

2012-03-06 Thread Felix Geyer
Ping. We are way past feature freeze and this blocks uploading a new zsh version. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/920436 Title: [MIR] yodl To manage notifications about this bug go t

[Bug 920436] Re: [MIR] yodl

2012-02-07 Thread Michael Terry
** Changed in: yodl (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Matthias Klose (doko) ** Changed in: icmake (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Matthias Klose (doko) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchp

[Bug 920436] Re: [MIR] yodl

2012-02-03 Thread Felix Geyer
** Changed in: yodl (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/920436 Title: [MIR] yodl To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launc

[Bug 920436] Re: [MIR] yodl

2012-01-31 Thread Felix Geyer
I think they are in the upstream tarball but Debian strips them before creating their orig.tar.bz2. Anyway the reason to regnerate the docs is that we have the zsh configs in /etc/zsh but the pre-generated docs say the configs are in /etc. -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 920436] Re: [MIR] yodl

2012-01-31 Thread Matthias Klose
hmm another "make" in main? are the generated zsh docs still included in the zsh sources? ** Changed in: yodl (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/9

[Bug 920436] Re: [MIR] yodl

2012-01-23 Thread Daniel Hahler
** Description changed: Rationale: A new version of the zsh package from Debian requires yodl as a build-dependency to generate its docs. See bug #762286 yodl itself requires icmake to build. Security: Both packages have no security history. Quality assurance: - Thr packages see