[Bug 893190] Re: Qa-testing failures for 2.6.35-903.27

2011-12-11 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package linux-ti-omap4 - 2.6.35-903.28 --- linux-ti-omap4 (2.6.35-903.28) maverick-proposed; urgency=low * Release Tracking Bug - LP: #897740 [ Upstream Kernel Changes ] * crypto: ghash - Avoid null pointer dereference if no key is set - LP: #

[Bug 893190] Re: Qa-testing failures for 2.6.35-903.27

2011-12-08 Thread Herton R. Krzesinski
Since this is related to QA tests, real verification will be done in QA (regression-testing) after verification, and will fail if it's not solved on QA, thus marking as verification-done. ** Tags removed: verification-needed-maverick ** Tags added: verification-done-maverick -- You received this

[Bug 893190] Re: Qa-testing failures for 2.6.35-903.27

2011-12-05 Thread Herton R. Krzesinski
This bug is awaiting verification that the kernel in -proposed solves the problem (linux-ti-omap4 2.6.35-903.28). Please test the kernel and update this bug with the results. If the problem is solved, change the tag 'verification-needed-maverick' to 'verification-done-maverick'. If verification is

[Bug 893190] Re: Qa-testing failures for 2.6.35-903.27

2011-12-04 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/maverick-proposed/linux-ti-omap4 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/893190 Title: Qa-testing failures for 2.6.35-903.27 To manage notifications about this bug

[Bug 893190] Re: Qa-testing failures for 2.6.35-903.27

2011-11-25 Thread Tim Gardner
** Changed in: linux-ti-omap4 (Ubuntu Maverick) Status: New => Fix Committed ** Changed in: linux-ti-omap4 (Ubuntu Maverick) Assignee: (unassigned) => Paolo Pisati (p-pisati) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 893190] Re: Qa-testing failures for 2.6.35-903.27

2011-11-24 Thread Paolo Pisati
** Description changed: - During the qa-testing of 2.6.35-903.27 several missing config options - went uncovered, the complete logs are available here: + During the qa-testing of 2.6.35-903.27 several missing patches went + uncovered, the complete logs are available here: https://bugs.launchp

[Bug 893190] Re: Qa-testing failures for 2.6.35-903.27

2011-11-24 Thread Paolo Pisati
while for Yama we need: maverick/master 2d8035 Yama: fix default relationship to check thread group 4af9ec Yama: use thread group leader when creating match respectively LP737676 and LP729839 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to U

[Bug 893190] Re: Qa-testing failures for 2.6.35-903.27

2011-11-23 Thread Paolo Pisati
CONFIG_STRICT_DEVMEM enabled ... FAIL /dev/mem unreadable for kernel memory ... (exit code 5) FAIL same as SECCOMP, entered Linux 2.6.36-rc7 as "087aaff ARM: implement CONFIG_STRICT_DEVMEM by disabling access to RAM via /dev/mem" -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 893190] Re: Qa-testing failures for 2.6.35-903.27

2011-11-23 Thread Paolo Pisati
about SECCOMP: CONFIG_SECCOMP enabled ... FAIL ... CONFIG_SECCOMP enabled ... (skipped: not available on ARM) ok it was not available back then on arm, it entered Linux 2.6.36-rc7 as "70c70d9 ARM: SECCOMP support" -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, w

[Bug 893190] Re: Qa-testing failures for 2.6.35-903.27

2011-11-23 Thread Paolo Pisati
== FAIL: Make sure the stack guard page does not split the stack on mlock -- Traceback (most recent call last): File "./test-kernel.py", line 103, in test_guard_

[Bug 893190] Re: Qa-testing failures for 2.6.35-903.27

2011-11-21 Thread Herton R. Krzesinski
** Also affects: linux-ti-omap4 (Ubuntu Maverick) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: linux-ti-omap4 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.