[Bug 86919] Re: transport shouldn't indirect through control_files

2011-01-20 Thread Jelmer Vernooij
** Changed in: bzr (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/86919 Title: transport shouldn't indirect through control_files -- ubuntu-bugs mail

[Bug 86919] Re: transport shouldn't indirect through control_files

2009-08-26 Thread Martin Pool
The use of LockableFiles as a wrapper for a Transport no longer exists. This class could still be cleaned up a bit, for which see bug 88848. ** Changed in: bzr Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- transport shouldn't indirect through control_files https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/86919 Yo

[Bug 86919] Re: transport shouldn't indirect through control_files

2009-07-26 Thread Martin Pool
bzr no longer indirects through control_files for IO-type operations, which was the original purpose of this bug. The main purpose of LockableFiles as it currently exists is to coordinate a transaction object with the state of the lock. It also still provides the _find_modes method. _find_mode

[Bug 86919] Re: transport shouldn't indirect through control_files

2009-02-09 Thread Andrea Corbellini
** Changed in: bzr (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Low Status: New => Triaged -- transport shouldn't indirect through control_files https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/86919 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubu

[Bug 86919] Re: transport shouldn't indirect through control_files

2008-04-16 Thread Martin Pool
** Also affects: bzr Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: bzr Importance: Undecided => Medium Assignee: (unassigned) => Martin Pool (mbp) Status: New => Confirmed -- transport shouldn't indirect through control_files https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/86919 You