** Changed in: dapper-backports
Status: Incomplete => Won't Fix
--
Please backport backuppc 3.0.0-3ubuntu1 from Gutsy to Feisty
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/86836
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
I'm thinking we should close this now that Hardy (LTS) is out. The
original motivation was to have backuppc 3.0 under an LTS release, which
is now the case. Seems to make a Dapper backport moot.
Comments? Mark the dapper portion as "fix released" ?
--
Please backport backuppc 3.0.0-3ubuntu1 from
unsubscribing ubuntu-archive for now since there is nothing to do there
--
Please backport backuppc 3.0.0-3ubuntu1 from Gutsy to Feisty
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/86836
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubunt
This is still blocked on libfile-rsyncp-perl which needs testing on
Dapper.
--
Please backport backuppc 3.0.0-3ubuntu1 from Gutsy to Feisty
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/86836
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
u
** Changed in: dapper-backports
Status: New => Incomplete
--
Please backport backuppc 3.0.0-3ubuntu1 from Gutsy to Feisty
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/86836
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
libfile-rsyncp-perl needs to be backported first as Scott says.
backuppc binary has sysv-rc (>= 2.86.ds1-14.1ubuntu2) dependency which cannot
be satisfied in dapper.
The strict sysv-rc versioning is needed for "dh_installinit --
multiuser" call in debian/rules (this probably refers the change " -
Please have a look at what else needs to be installed/updated in Dapper
to make this work. I would imagine, at a minimum, that libfile-rsyncp-
perl would need to be backported first. There is a separate bug for
that.
--
Please backport backuppc 3.0.0-3ubuntu1 from Gutsy to Feisty
https://bugs.l
Dapper (Ubuntu LTS) would benefit from this as well. Rationale: BackupPC
is server-based, and Dapper LTS is what a lot of run on our servers.
Having BackupPC in Dapper means we get the goodness of BackupPC 3.0
without moving away from LTS.
** Changed in: dapper-backports (upstream)
Product:
* Trying to backport backuppc...
-
-
-
I: Extracting backuppc_3.0.0-3ubuntu1.dsc ... done.
I: Building backport of backuppc-3.0.0 as 3.0.0-3ubuntu1~feisty1 ... done.
** Changed in: feisty-backports (upstream)
Status: In Progress => Fix Released
--
Please backport backuppc 3.0
libfile-rsyncp-perl backport done. Approved by ubuntu-backporters.
** Summary changed:
- backport backuppc 3.0.0-3ubuntu1 in feisty
+ Please backport backuppc 3.0.0-3ubuntu1 from Gutsy to Feisty
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: backuppc
Debian Unstable has backuppc 3.0 in th
10 matches
Mail list logo
