Indeed, I see no valid high priority bug to give reason to update lucid
as well... if the lib needs to be backported, let it be done in
backports. Rejected lucid-proposed upload.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://
Rejecting pycryptopp maverick upload because of comment 23 and maverick
is three months before EOL.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/811721
Title:
update pycryptopp to version 0.5.29-1
** No longer affects: pycryptopp (Ubuntu Lucid)
** No longer affects: pycryptopp (Ubuntu Maverick)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/811721
Title:
update pycryptopp to version 0.5.29-1
the tahoe versions in maverick and lucid work fine with the available
pycryptopp. This is no reason to do an SRU.
if you want to backport tahoe-lafs then also backport pycryptop.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https:/
