*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 33438 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/33438
My understanding from the sysadmin team in the past is that serving
cdimage over HTTPS would add an unacceptable amount of load to an
already stretched set of machines. That goes double for
releases.ubuntu.com,
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 33438 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/33438
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 33438
provide SHA1SUMS as well as MD5SUMS on cdimage
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubun
Belabela,
Publicly editable does not mean it's insecure. The Wiki does keep track
of all edits so that an audit can happen. By your theory the
information you linked to on Wikipedia is insecure as well, because I
can go and edit it freely and forge all kinds of information. HTTPS
does not make
"** This bug is no longer flagged as a security vulnerability"
are you kidding me? are you serious?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/789688
Title:
UbuntuHashes doesn't contains SHA256
** This bug is no longer flagged as a security vulnerability
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/789688
Title:
UbuntuHashes doesn't contains SHA256
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bug
omg...but the linked site:
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Installation/MinimalCD#64-bit
it publicly editable... great...it's a bug, no? just like the
/UbuntuHashes was editable...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
ht
I found SHA1 sums here!! :
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Installation/MinimalCD#64-bit PC (amd64,
x86_64)
:)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/789688
Title:
UbuntuHashes doesn't c
I would not recommend pushing the issue. There are many more important
things that need to be worked on, so this may very well sit on the back
burner. I believe that there is a package you could check out, make the
changes, and then propose a merge and see if it will be accepted.
On May 29, 2011 2:
ohh, sry. :)
then I will wait till weekdays
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/789688
Title:
UbuntuHashes doesn't contains SHA256
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.c
Because people are volunteers, and its the weekend, and I believe this
discussion was brought up in the past and it was decided to stay with md5.
On May 29, 2011 1:30 PM, "belabela" <789...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote:
> What's taking so long?? Can I have editor permission to this site. It
> could be
What's taking so long?? Can I have editor permission to this site. It
could be fixed in about ~5 minutes... Why is it takes SOO long to
modify them???
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/
** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
** Visibility changed to: Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/789688
Title:
UbuntuHashes doesn't contains SHA256
12 matches
Mail list logo
