** Changed in: perl (Debian)
Status: Unknown => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/739693
Title:
Configure does not find libs in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu
To manage notif
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/perl
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/739693
Title:
Configure does not find libs in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubu
This bug was fixed in the package perl - 5.10.1-17ubuntu4
---
perl (5.10.1-17ubuntu4) natty; urgency=low
* debian/config.debian: pass multiarch paths to the build (if
available) so that we're able to find libraries needed to build.
LP: #739693.
-- Steve LangasekWed, 30
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 01:26:05AM -, Andy Dougherty wrote:
> > If you *must* check the platform, $(lsb_release -is) is a better check, but
> > lsb_release is not included by default on Debian
> > systems and this issue is going to turn up on Debian too soon enough.
> But what would the outp
> If you *must* check the platform, $(lsb_release -is) is a better check, but
> lsb_release is not included by default on Debian
> systems and this issue is going to turn up on Debian too soon enough.
But what would the output of "lsb_release -is" be?
I do appreciate your warning that Debian wi
>>> First: How does one reliably detect this version of Ubuntu? (Assume I
>>> have never used Ubuntu, and don't have access to it for testing.)
>>look in '/etc/issue' should be good.
> What, precisely, do I look for? I want to write a shell test to add in these
> extra
> paths on this version (a
>> First: How does one reliably detect this version of Ubuntu? (Assume I
>> have never used Ubuntu, and don't have access to it for testing.)
>look in '/etc/issue' should be good.
What, precisely, do I look for? I want to write a shell test to add in these
extra
paths on this version (and futu
(BTW, since we have every intention of proposing multiarch as a cross-
distribution extension to the FHS, at some point we will hopefully have
a standalone tool other than dpkg-architecture that can be queried for
the correct paths; but we're not there yet.)
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker
Hi Andy,
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 07:51:36PM -, Andy Dougherty wrote:
> Assuming this is a deliberate change in Ubuntu,
Yes, this is a deliberate change. Sorry that this is causing trouble for
building perl, it seems that there are a few more build systems out there
bypassing the compiler's v
On Mar 30, 2011 3:51pm, Andy Dougherty <739...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote:
> This issue is being tracked upstream as
> http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=86854
> I'd like to fix this upstream, but need some basic information first.
> Assuming this is a deliberate change in Ubuntu, t
This issue is being tracked upstream as
http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=86854
I'd like to fix this upstream, but need some basic information first.
Assuming this is a deliberate change in Ubuntu, the fix for perl-5.14 will be
to detect this situation in the hints/linux.sh hint
seen in a test rebuild too. are these changes enough to fix the buil
failures of various perl modules too?
http://people.ubuntuwire.org/~wgrant/rebuild-ftbfs-test/test-
rebuild-20110329-natty.html
** Changed in: perl (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
** Changed in: perl (Ubuntu)
** Tags added: patch
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/739693
Title:
Configure does not find libs in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
http
On Mar 22, 2011 12:53pm, Steve Peters wrote:
> I can look into this, unfortunately not today. There was a lot of work
> done
> to get the correct 64-bit libs found on Linux since there didn't seem to
> be
> a standard location for them across distributions. My guess is that Ubuntu
> currently
I can look into this, unfortunately not today. There was a lot of work done
to get the correct 64-bit libs found on Linux since there didn't seem to be
a standard location for them across distributions. My guess is that Ubuntu
currently has found another way to make this happen or there is some o
I am sure there are other suitable fixes and possible debate if this
should be made a 'default' search path but here is a potential fix none
the less.
** Patch added: "Add the new lib paths to default search paths used by
Configure"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/perl/+bug/739693/+
** Attachment added: "pbuilder screen log"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/739693/+attachment/1927920/+files/screenlog.0
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/739693
Title:
Configure does
17 matches
Mail list logo
