[Bug 73429] Re: /usr/local/lib is not properly supported

2008-07-06 Thread Chris Coulson
This was actually fixed in the version of glibc that shipped with Gutsy. /usr/local/lib is defined in /etc/ld.so.conf.d/libc.conf ** Changed in: glibc (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- /usr/local/lib is not properly supported https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/73429 You received this

[Bug 73429] Re: /usr/local/lib is not properly supported

2007-05-08 Thread Kjmph
I concur. Using Feisty Fawn, /usr/local/lib is still not a part of the ld.so.cache. Usual Linux semantics is the distro packages go into /usr/lib while third party builds go in /usr/local/lib. Creating and adding /usr/local/lib to /etc/ld.so.conf.d/local.conf and rerunning ldconfig will solve thi

[Bug 73429] Re: /usr/local/lib is not properly supported

2007-04-16 Thread VF
** Changed in: glibc (Ubuntu) Sourcepackagename: None => glibc -- /usr/local/lib is not properly supported https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/73429 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bu