[Bug 71997] Re: Include OCFS2/CLUSTER/GFS in non-server kernels

2006-12-03 Thread Jerry Haltom
Thanks. That's a perfectly acceptable answer. Bug closed. -- Include OCFS2/CLUSTER/GFS in non-server kernels https://launchpad.net/bugs/71997 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 71997] Re: Include OCFS2/CLUSTER/GFS in non-server kernels

2006-12-03 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
Cluster filesystems don't like some of the options required in desktop (for example PREEMPT_*) that will make them unusable (the can lead to data corruptions) due to their design. Fabio -- Include OCFS2/CLUSTER/GFS in non-server kernels https://launchpad.net/bugs/71997 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing l

[Bug 71997] Re: Include OCFS2/CLUSTER/GFS in non-server kernels

2006-12-03 Thread Jerry Haltom
Another issue with this approach is the lack of linux-restricted- modules-*-server. So, on my desktop at least, playing with OCFS2 is going to require me to build my own modules, take them from the -server package and drop them into my -generic /lib/modules, or reboot every time I want to use OCFS2

[Bug 71997] Re: Include OCFS2/CLUSTER/GFS in non-server kernels

2006-12-03 Thread Jerry Haltom
Of course I haven't. The massive majority of desktop installs will never need it. What I've tried to do is challenge the argument for excluding it. It isn't loaded by default. It is simply a small file that sits idle in the /lib/modules folder. And for the <.01% of users who want to try it out wi

[Bug 71997] Re: Include OCFS2/CLUSTER/GFS in non-server kernels

2006-11-19 Thread Ben Collins
You've given no reason to include it. I think we are pretty fair in keeping it separated. ** Changed in: linux-source-2.6.19 (Ubuntu) Status: Unconfirmed => Rejected -- Include OCFS2/CLUSTER/GFS in non-server kernels https://launchpad.net/bugs/71997 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bu