Note that in precise this will be disabled again, and be a wontfix.
Please see bug 812394.
** Changed in: policykit-desktop-privileges (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Released => Won't Fix
** Changed in: policykit-desktop-privileges (Ubuntu)
Milestone: natty-alpha-3 => None
--
You received this
** Changed in: oem-priority
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/710796
Title:
[regression] hibernate no longer works on natty
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing li
This bug was fixed in the package policykit-desktop-privileges - 0.4
---
policykit-desktop-privileges (0.4) natty; urgency=low
* Re-enable hibernation by default. It can be disabled by dropping a file
into /etc/polkit-1/localauthority/ by OEMs if desired. (LP: #710796)
-- Marti
Just echoing Johns (comment 315) here. There's a very reliable tuxonice ppa
currently tracking maverick; I use it on all my machines and none of them
currently has hibernation problems. The old argument against tuxoice was that
the diff against the upstream kernel was too onerous to maintain.
Steve, thanks for the heads-up. I'm happy to re-enable it by default
then, it's easy enough for the OEM team to disable it by placing a
single file into /var/lib/polkit-1/...
** Changed in: policykit-desktop-privileges (Ubuntu Natty)
Assignee: Canonical Desktop Team (canonical-desktop-team) =
If we're having such problems with hibernation, I'd say there is some
value to be had in considering shipping Ubuntu with TuxOnIce, which
provides better performance and compatibility. It looks like it will
never be fully integrated into the vanilla kernel, so it is up to
distributions.
--
You re
I have an IBM Thinkpad T41. For me, the screen under X11 is borked
terminally after suspend. Suspend also would not be an option most of
the time because when I stop working to freeze state, this can be for
quite long, and I don't keep my power supply running while the computer
is off -- a waste
> One proposal from OEM is to keep hibernate enabled at the kernel
> level, retain an option in gnome-power-manager to put the system
> into hibernate on a critical battery event, and remove hibernate from
> the rest of the UI (the power menu + shutdown dialog).
That doesn't make a lot of sense to
I do not think that hibernation should be disable by default; it is used
by many and is the only sane choice to avoid data loss when the battery
runs out. If OEMs do not want to enable it then they should be easily
able to disable it but it should remain available for the rest of us. If
hibernation
** Also affects: oem-priority
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: oem-priority
Importance: Undecided => High
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/710796
Title:
[r
I'm using hibernation on my 2 machines and it works fine. On one of
them, restoring from hibernation is even *slower* than clean boot (lots
of RAM).
But - nobody can measure my time of opening all my applications again,
with specific ones, which cannot be saved to restore as it was.
That's why i'm
@Martin - the OEM team doesn't disable hibernate on every system.
Rather, we put in a great deal of effort to ensure that it *does* work
on systems that we enable. Hibernate support is a requirement of many
OEM team customers, in order to avoid data loss in low-battery
situations.
The OEM team doe
I mainly did this by request of the OEM team, as they said they disable
hibernate on pretty much every shipped box, and because the kernel team
said that they get tons of bug reports with it.
But then again, if some people still actually use it, I guess we could
turn it back on by default. It is v
** Changed in: policykit-desktop-privileges (Ubuntu Natty)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed
** Changed in: policykit-desktop-privileges (Ubuntu Natty)
Status: Fix Committed => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subs
** Changed in: policykit-desktop-privileges (Ubuntu Natty)
Importance: Undecided => High
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/710796
Title:
[regression] hibernate no longer works on natt
moving to polkit, and tracking the kernel issue in a separate bug report
** Package changed: linux (Ubuntu Natty) => policykit-desktop-privileges
(Ubuntu Natty)
** Changed in: policykit-desktop-privileges (Ubuntu Natty)
Status: In Progress => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notificati
Not confused, just trying to seperate the issues. Currently Hibernate is turned
off in two levels:
1. Policy Kit hides it in the UI
2. The kernel removed support.
Let's keep this bug to discuss and track #1
Let's use bug #710877 to track re-enabling Hibernate in the Kernel, #2
** Changed in: lin
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Natty)
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/710796
Title:
[regression] hibernate no longer works on natty
--
ubuntu-bu
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Natty)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Andy Whitcroft (apw)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/710796
Title:
[regression] hibernate no longer works on natty
-
@Rick I think you're misunderstanding. There are two issues: GUI and
kernel. The GUI is configurable (whew), but the major issues is that
hibernation was removed from the kernel, and is the bigger problem:
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git?p=ubuntu/ubuntu-
natty.git;a=commitdiff;h=2e5f0ea801534914c6747
Also please note that a decision has not been taken on whether to hide
Hibernate permanently or not, it is under discussion, though.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/710796
Title:
[regr
I used to use hibernate a lot myself, mainly for saving state. But I
don't use it much anymore, mainly because it's slow and seems really
unreliable. For the reasons jesse and kees listed, I would love to have
the feature again, but as long as it remains slow and buggy it's not
really in a usable
The feature was not hidden because it had no benefits, but rather it has
very high costs. A lot can and does go wrong with hibernate, and for
many people, it just never works. It's worth exploring whether we can
get by without the feature.
In the meantime, the GUI is hidden, but the feature is not
23 matches
Mail list logo
