[Bug 696628] Re: UBUNTU 10.10 INSTALLATION FAILURE

2011-10-08 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
[Expired for Ubuntu because there has been no activity for 60 days.] ** Changed in: ubuntu Status: Incomplete => Expired -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/696628 Title: UBUNTU 10

[Bug 696628] Re: UBUNTU 10.10 INSTALLATION FAILURE

2011-08-09 Thread komputes
I would like to attempt to reproduce this issue. Could you please provide step-by-step instructions on how you ran into this issue. Please also let me know which ISOs/Architectures were used and what steps were taken for auto/manual partitioning and mount-point assigning. ** Changed in: ubuntu

[Bug 696628] Re: UBUNTU 10.10 INSTALLATION FAILURE

2011-03-04 Thread Bryce Harrington
Doesn't sound like an X problem actually... ** Package changed: xorg (Ubuntu) => ubuntu -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/696628 Title: UBUNTU 10.10 INSTALLATION FAILURE -- ubuntu-bug

[Bug 696628] Re: UBUNTU 10.10 INSTALLATION FAILURE

2011-01-03 Thread bugbot
** Tags added: maverick -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/696628 Title: UBUNTU 10.10 INSTALLATION FAILURE -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.

[Bug 696628] Re: UBUNTU 10.10 INSTALLATION FAILURE

2011-01-02 Thread oddasee
A final word about the partition. Following the 10.10 installation the permissions on the partition had to be changed from the mount point in /media in order to provide read access under 9.10 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ub

[Bug 696628] Re: UBUNTU 10.10 INSTALLATION FAILURE

2011-01-02 Thread oddasee
Regarding the state of the partition: it contains script files for which the permissions got scrambled. After using chmod, they were still unusable as executables: "permission denied". ...As I recall... the permissions appeared to be changed by chmod according to ls, but generated the "permission