kde4libs is no longer in main. I believe this is a result of the
"universe build dependencies are allowed for packaging in main" change
done shortly before the release of Ubuntu 16.04 LTS. Therefore, I am
closing this bug.
** Changed in: hupnp (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed => Invalid
--
Am 02.02.2014 01:51, schrieb José Tomás Atria:
> So, who has the power to make something in main (kde4libs, i suppose)
> depend on hupnp? It is rather unacceptable that this and #975327 are
> both stuck in ubuntu's bureaucratic limbo since 2012, if everything is
> already fixed and commited.
there
So, who has the power to make something in main (kde4libs, i suppose)
depend on hupnp? It is rather unacceptable that this and #975327 are
both stuck in ubuntu's bureaucratic limbo since 2012, if everything is
already fixed and commited.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a mem
Something in main should depend on it, then it will show up in the
component-mismatches report, and then an archive admin will try to fix
that, note this bug is fix committed, and promote it.
So the next step should be letting kdelibs depend on hupnp again (looks
like you need to add a Build-Depen
This bug is marked fix-committed but hupnp is still in universe.
http://packages.ubuntu.com/en/source/saucy/net/hupnp . What needs to be
done for hupnp to become part of main?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bu
Approved. I sync'ed from Debian. The symbols file got dropped, but we
no longer block a package on that, especially a C++ one. It'd be nice
to see a Kubuntu team subscribed to bugs.
** Changed in: hupnp (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification b
* No Open Ports actually probably probably doesn't apply anymore (since
Kubuntu is no longer an official Canonical flavor).
* Really, kdelibs should be in universe. I note that a few packages in
main build-depend on it though (libproxy, libreoffice, subversion),
keeping it in main against its wi
So, it is almost 2 years and it is a big blocker for the whole UPnP on
KDE. See also bug 975327 for details.
** Changed in: hupnp (Ubuntu)
Status: Expired => Confirmed
** Changed in: hupnp (Ubuntu)
Milestone: None => ubuntu-13.04-month-3
--
You received this bug notification because
[Expired for hupnp (Ubuntu Natty) because there has been no activity for
60 days.]
** Changed in: hupnp (Ubuntu Natty)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bug
The code that uses it is in kde4libs solid/solid/backends/upnp. It gets
run by the Plasma desktop device notifier which announces new devices on
the system, or in this case the local network. It has actually been
disabled in kdelibs 4.6.0 due for release tomorrow due to usability
issues
(http://w
Failed to build on amd64/armel due to differing symbols files.
This package is in universe, and for some reason kde4libs (in paticular,
the libsolid4 binary) already depends on it. This renders the entire
Kubuntu uninstallable, so I promoted only the libhupnp0 binary to main
to unbreak Alpha-2.
*
What portion of the code would be running the UPnP service? I.e. what
would it look like for the default system? UPnP is similar to mDNS, so
it may fall into the "network infrastructure" exception clause.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subs
.symbols files added in 0.0~svn77-0ubuntu3
I've moved it back to universe pending the security decision
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/682404
Title:
MIR hupnp
--
ubuntu-bugs mailin
There are No Open Ports exceptions for the DHCP client and mDNS. This
seems similar, but Kees, how do I get a formal answer from the security
team about UPnP and the policy?
So I'm setting this to Incomplete for the symbols file issue and the
UPnP question.
** Changed in: hupnp (Ubuntu)
S
It seems strange that QtSoap is included in this package, but since it
doesn't exist anywhere else, I guess that's fine.
For the audit, nothing jumps out quickly at me. I am curious, however,
if running software with a UPNP server would violate the No Open Ports
policy.
** Changed in: hupnp (Ubun
I looked at this, and it's mostly good. But a blocker for MIR sign-off
is that there is no symbols file (or usage of dh_makeshlibs -V). This
package's API is specifically not stable and subject to revision. To
help with upgrade issues, I'd want to see a symbols file.
I'm also passing to securit
pre-promoted to main for alpha 1
--
MIR hupnp
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/682404
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubun
17 matches
Mail list logo
