[Bug 68191] Re: Guidance Power Managment and Speedstep

2006-11-17 Thread emvy
It seems that one core goes into "performance" state instead of ondemand. cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/*/cpufreq/*cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/*/cpufreq/* 0 200 200 100 200 1667000 1333000 100 userspace powersave ondemand conservative performance 100 centrino userspace 2000

[Bug 68191] Re: Guidance Power Managment and Speedstep

2006-11-16 Thread emvy
Same bug at me. https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+source/kde-guidance/+bug/72108 After suspending and resuming a laptop (Core Duo T2500, IBM T60), the clock speed of one CPU core goes up to maximum (2.0 GHz at me). The another core remains at low speed (certainly, no process consumes the CPU

Re: [Bug 68191] Re: Guidance Power Managment and Speedstep

2006-10-25 Thread GrinGEO
Thanks for your fast reply In the attachment I did put the files... please let me know. Kindest regards Igor Am Mittwoch, 25. Oktober 2006 17:10 schrieb Luka Renko: > This cannot be caused by quidance-power-management as all the cpufreq > stuff is done by kernel (ondemand) and powernowd (if ondema

[Bug 68191] Re: Guidance Power Managment and Speedstep

2006-10-25 Thread Luka Renko
This cannot be caused by quidance-power-management as all the cpufreq stuff is done by kernel (ondemand) and powernowd (if ondemand is not supported). It may be that hibernate/suspend preparation does something wrong. Can you attach: - output of "dmesg" - output of "cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/*