[Bug 67698] Re: prerm should not remove alternative on upgrade

2013-06-14 Thread Phillip Susi
This package has been removed from Ubuntu. Closing all related bugs. ** Changed in: galeon (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/67698 Title: pr

[Bug 67698] Re: prerm should not remove alternative on upgrade

2010-11-28 Thread Michael Meskes
** Changed in: bsdmainutils (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- prerm should not remove alternative on upgrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/67698 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing

[Bug 67698] Re: prerm should not remove alternative on upgrade

2010-01-26 Thread Sebastien Bacher
the current gnome-session doesn't have this issue ** Changed in: gnome-session (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- prerm should not remove alternative on upgrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/67698 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, whi

[Bug 67698] Re: prerm should not remove alternative on upgrade

2009-07-04 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/karmic/irssi -- prerm should not remove alternative on upgrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/67698 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com ht

[Bug 67698] Re: prerm should not remove alternative on upgrade

2008-12-23 Thread Gaetan Nadon
Thanks Malcolm Thanks for reporting this bug and any supporting documentation. Since this bug has enough information provided for a developer to begin work, I'm going to mark it as confirmed and let them handle it from here. Thanks for taking the time to make Ubuntu better! BugSquad ** Changed i

[Bug 67698] Re: prerm should not remove alternative on upgrade

2008-12-23 Thread Malcolm Parsons
bsdmainutils.prerm calls update-alternatives unconditionally in Intrepid: $ cat /var/lib/dpkg/info/bsdmainutils.prerm #!/bin/sh set -e update-alternatives --remove write /usr/bin/bsd-write so this is still a problem. ** Changed in: bsdmainutils (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => New -- p

[Bug 67698] Re: prerm should not remove alternative on upgrade

2008-12-22 Thread Gaetan Nadon
This bug for bsdmainutils shows up as a new bug needing to be triaged. Given the time elapsed, is this bug still an issue for bsdmainutils? If so, I'll move it to Confirm. BugSquad ** Changed in: bsdmainutils (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- prerm should not remove alternative on u

[Bug 67698] Re: prerm should not remove alternative on upgrade

2008-01-24 Thread Steve Langasek
bug is fixed in totem; while not mentioned in the changelog, the hardy totem-xine/totem-gstreamer package has: if [ "$1" = "remove" ] || [ "$1" = "deconfigure" ] ; then update-alternatives [...] fi so the alternative is not reset on upgrades. ** Changed in: totem (Ubuntu) Status:

[Bug 67698] Re: prerm should not remove alternative on upgrade

2007-11-03 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
irssi (0.8.12-2ubuntu1) hardy; urgency=low * Merge with Debian, remaining Ubuntu changes: - Added debian/patches/90irc-ubuntu-com.dpatch (Launchpad #52690). - Modify Maintainer value to match the DebianMaintainerField spec. - debian/irssi.prerm: Do not alternative. LP: #67698. -- E

[Bug 67698] Re: prerm should not remove alternative on upgrade

2007-11-02 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
** Changed in: irssi (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Low Assignee: (unassigned) => Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (pochu) Status: New => In Progress -- prerm should not remove alternative on upgrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/67698 You received this bug notification because you are

[Bug 67698] Re: prerm should not remove alternative on upgrade

2007-03-11 Thread Sebastien Bacher
Bug fixed for gedit with this upload: gedit (2.18.0-0ubuntu1) feisty; urgency=low . * New upstream version: - Include list of active plugins in BugBuddy reports - Make plugins work with python 2.5 on 64 bits architectures - Misc bugfixes * debian/gedit.prerm: - don't re

[Bug 67698] Re: prerm should not remove alternative on upgrade

2007-03-05 Thread Sebastien Bacher
That upload fixes the gconf2 problem: gconf2 (2.18.0-1ubuntu1) feisty; urgency=low . * Sync with Debian * New upstream version: Misc: - Make sure error strings are utf-8 - don't include xml-entry.h twice - fix leak in gconf meta info code - remove more popt gunk

[Bug 67698] Re: prerm should not remove alternative on upgrade

2006-10-25 Thread Sebastien Bacher
** Changed in: totem (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Low Status: Unconfirmed => Confirmed ** Changed in: gnome-session (Ubuntu) Status: Unconfirmed => Confirmed ** Changed in: gedit (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Low Assignee: (unassigned) => Ubuntu Desktop Bugs

[Bug 67698] Re: prerm should not remove alternative on upgrade

2006-10-24 Thread Malcolm Parsons
** Also affects: gconf (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed ** Also affects: gconf2 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed ** Also affects: gedit (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed ** Also affects: irssi (Ubuntu) Importan

[Bug 67698] Re: prerm should not remove alternative on upgrade

2006-10-24 Thread Malcolm Parsons
It was manual. 12:15 < seb128> removing the "update" case seems fine to me 12:15 < seb128> I'll do that for edgy+1 12:15 < pepsiman> can I add tasks for galeon, etc 12:15 < seb128> sure 12:15 < pepsiman> k, thx 12:15 < seb128> rename the bug maybe 12:15 < seb128> something like "prerm should not r