** Changed in: git-buildpackage (Debian)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/668849
Title:
gbp does not support 2nd orig tarball
To manage not
** Changed in: git-buildpackage (Debian)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/668849
Title:
gbp does not support 2nd orig tarball
To manage notifi
** Changed in: git-buildpackage (Debian)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/668849
Title:
gbp does not support 2nd orig tarball
To manage notifications ab
On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 12:53:14PM -, Éric Piel wrote:
> Can anyone suggest a manual workaround to use multiple orig tarballs?
> I've tried to follow the workflow descibed in the upstream bug [1]. It
> seems to do the trick for keeping the sources and tarballs, but building
> fails ("dpkg-sourc
Can anyone suggest a manual workaround to use multiple orig tarballs?
I've tried to follow the workflow descibed in the upstream bug [1]. It
seems to do the trick for keeping the sources and tarballs, but building
fails ("dpkg-source aborting due to unexpected upstream changes").
So far is what I
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: git-buildpackage
using a self-compiled, backported 0.5.4 package here (the latest I could
backport to lucid)
- DebSrc3.0 allows for a second orig tarball, but gbp does not appear to
- support that yet. Try building
+ DebSrc3.0 allows for a
** Changed in: git-buildpackage (Debian)
Status: Unknown => New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/668849
Title:
gbp does not support 2nd orig tarball
To manage notifications abou
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #561071
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=561071
** Also affects: git-buildpackage (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=561071
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification
most of the discussion made sense to me. I'll gladly leave worrying
about the technical details to others, though.
I believe you mentioned this in that ticket already, so I think it's on
your radar. It's my understanding that DebSrc3.0 now unpacks the source
with patches applied. One example is
On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 07:45:01AM -, Rolf Leggewie wrote:
> isdnutils in Debian experimental has this 2nd tarball now if you need a
> place to have a look. Git repo is at http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-
> maint/isdnutils.git
I'll try to have a look during fosdem. #561071 has some more discus
isdnutils in Debian experimental has this 2nd tarball now if you need a
place to have a look. Git repo is at http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-
maint/isdnutils.git
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.n
Any news?
The isdnutils package I maintain is quite complicated and I can no
longer support it with gbp in lucid
** Summary changed:
- gbp does not recreate 2nd orig tarball
+ gbp does not support 2nd orig tarball
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, w
12 matches
Mail list logo
