** Changed in: gvfs
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/667256
Title:
Copying via Nautilus much slower than via cp / pv
To manage notifications about
upstream commented:
"Given that this is copying from one disk to another, it will be using the local
file implementation of gio which lives in glib, not gvfs. Moving to glib...
Anyway, does this still happen? That seems like pretty odd behavior."
is that still an issue?
** Changed in: gvfs (Ub
** Changed in: gvfs
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/667256
Title:
Copying via Nautilus much slower than via cp / pv
To manage notifications about this
Thank you for your bug report
** Changed in: gvfs (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Low
** Changed in: gvfs (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
--
Copying via Nautilus much slower than via cp / pv
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/667256
You received this bug notification because you are a
** Changed in: gvfs
Status: Unknown => New
** Changed in: gvfs
Importance: Unknown => Medium
--
Copying via Nautilus much slower than via cp / pv
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/667256
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ub
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #633734
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=633734
** Also affects: gvfs via
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=633734
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
Copying via Nautilus much slower than via cp / pv
https://bugs.launch
