[Bug 66205] Re: UVFe for scim-bridge from 0.2.7 to 0.4.6

2007-01-18 Thread Kai Kasurinen
There is 0.4.8-0ubuntu2 in Feisty. ** Changed in: scim-bridge (Ubuntu) Status: Unconfirmed => Fix Released -- UVFe for scim-bridge from 0.2.7 to 0.4.6 https://launchpad.net/bugs/66205 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubu

[Bug 66205] Re: UVFe for scim-bridge from 0.2.7 to 0.4.6

2006-10-28 Thread Paul Sladen
** Changed in: scim-bridge (Ubuntu) Target: later => ubuntu-7.04 -- UVFe for scim-bridge from 0.2.7 to 0.4.6 https://launchpad.net/bugs/66205 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 66205] Re: UVFe for scim-bridge from 0.2.7 to 0.4.6

2006-10-25 Thread Colin Watson
Action wasn't taken on this in time for Edgy, so it will have to happen early in Feisty. ** Changed in: scim-bridge (Ubuntu) Target: ubuntu-6.10 => later -- UVFe for scim-bridge from 0.2.7 to 0.4.6 https://launchpad.net/bugs/66205 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 66205] Re: UVFe for scim-bridge from 0.2.7 to 0.4.6

2006-10-17 Thread Andrew Mitchell
The changelog seems to detail mostly fixes from a quick glance - we wouldn't have much time to back out the change before release though. If it goes in, it should really go in in the next day or two. I'd give it a tentative +1 -- UVFe for scim-bridge from 0.2.7 to 0.4.6 https://launchpad.net/bugs

[Bug 66205] Re: UVFe for scim-bridge from 0.2.7 to 0.4.6

2006-10-16 Thread Daniel Holbach
I share Reinhard's view - although the changelog mentions a good bunch of fixes, we should have got this in earlier. There are now 10 days left until release. ZhengPeng, can you make sure you and the cjk-testers team are default subscribers for the scim packages? https://launchpad.net/distros/ubu

Re: [Bug 66205] Re: UVFe for scim-bridge from 0.2.7 to 0.4.6

2006-10-15 Thread ZhengPeng Hou
2006/10/15, Reinhard Tartler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > The changes look a bit too big for this point of edgy's development. apt > does not reveal any reverse depends. ZengPeng, could you perhaps give us > some sort of risk analyses? This package seems to be to provide a > dynamic library, which is loa

[Bug 66205] Re: UVFe for scim-bridge from 0.2.7 to 0.4.6

2006-10-15 Thread Reinhard Tartler
The changes look a bit too big for this point of edgy's development. apt does not reveal any reverse depends. ZengPeng, could you perhaps give us some sort of risk analyses? This package seems to be to provide a dynamic library, which is loaded by other apps. Honestly, I have no idea about scim. C

[Bug 66205] Re: UVFe for scim-bridge from 0.2.7 to 0.4.6

2006-10-14 Thread ZhengPeng Hou
pbuilderlog ** Attachment added: "pbuildlog" http://librarian.launchpad.net/4843750/_20061015_1416.buildlog ** Changed in: scim-bridge (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Wishlist Assignee: (unassigned) => MOTU UVF Team Target: None => ubuntu-6.10 -- UVFe for scim-bridge from 0.

[Bug 66205] Re: UVFe for scim-bridge from 0.2.7 to 0.4.6

2006-10-14 Thread ZhengPeng Hou
diff of the Upstream ** Attachment added: "diff of the Upstream" http://librarian.launchpad.net/4843748/changelog.diff -- UVFe for scim-bridge from 0.2.7 to 0.4.6 https://launchpad.net/bugs/66205 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/list

[Bug 66205] Re: UVFe for scim-bridge from 0.2.7 to 0.4.6

2006-10-14 Thread ZhengPeng Hou
diffstat of the upstream tarballs ** Attachment added: "diffstat of the upstream tarballs" http://librarian.launchpad.net/4843747/diffstat.txt -- UVFe for scim-bridge from 0.2.7 to 0.4.6 https://launchpad.net/bugs/66205 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.

[Bug 66205] Re: UVFe for scim-bridge from 0.2.7 to 0.4.6

2006-10-14 Thread ZhengPeng Hou
diffstat of the upstream tarballs ** Description changed: Binary package hint: scim-bridge - scim-bridge is a wrapper libray for SCIM, writen in C. Recently, - upstream author add the support for qt_immodule for scim, it can solve - bugs reported on scim-qtimm or relate to (guys use kubuntu