[Bug 660089] Re: nullmailer should not directly conflict with lsb

2012-09-26 Thread Nick Leverton
IANOMOTU but as Debian maintainer I'm happy to say that nullmailer now implements -bs and no longer conflicts with the LSB. This fix was recently imported to Ubuntu in version 1.11. ** Changed in: nullmailer (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification b

[Bug 660089] Re: nullmailer should not directly conflict with lsb

2012-05-17 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: nullmailer (Debian) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/660089 Title: nullmailer should not directly conflict with lsb To manage no

[Bug 660089] Re: nullmailer should not directly conflict with lsb

2012-01-24 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: nullmailer (Debian) Status: Won't Fix => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/660089 Title: nullmailer should not directly conflict with lsb To manage notif

[Bug 660089] Re: nullmailer should not directly conflict with lsb

2011-04-14 Thread osde8info
there are also a lot of errors if postfix is installed after lsb dpkg: lsb-invalid-mta: dependency problems, but removing anyway as you requested: lsb-core depends on lsb-invalid-mta | mail-transport-agent; however: Package lsb-invalid-mta is to be removed. Package mail-transport-agent is n

Re: [Bug 660089] Re: nullmailer should not directly conflict with lsb

2011-04-08 Thread Todd Vierling
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 8:44 AM, Nick Leverton wrote: > It still seems to be the case, however, that the -bs option for SMTP > mail submission is mandated by LSB.  Nullmailer doesn't do it by design, > so the conflict is genuine and not likely to go away without some work. Ubuntu has already viola

[Bug 660089] Re: nullmailer should not directly conflict with lsb

2011-04-04 Thread Bryce Harrington
[As per recent comments, unmarking patch as a solution since the patch is a workaround and not an appropriate fix. Also, ubsubbing sponsors since it sounds like further discussion is required with upstream to find a suitable long term fix, and the severity of the issue is not such that we require

[Bug 660089] Re: nullmailer should not directly conflict with lsb

2011-04-04 Thread Nick Leverton
Hi, Just dropping in - I'm the intending new Debian maintainer for nullmailer and I'd be open to reviewing the decision on dbug:271662 ( http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=271662 ) It still seems to be the case, however, that the -bs option for SMTP mail submission is mandated by LS

[Bug 660089] Re: nullmailer should not directly conflict with lsb

2011-04-04 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: nullmailer (Debian) Status: Unknown => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/660089 Title: nullmailer should not directly conflict with lsb -- ubuntu-bugs m

[Bug 660089] Re: nullmailer should not directly conflict with lsb

2011-04-02 Thread Andrew Starr-Bochicchio
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #271662 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=271662 ** Changed in: nullmailer (Debian) Importance: Undecided => Unknown ** Changed in: nullmailer (Debian) Status: New => Unknown ** Changed in: nullmailer (Debian) Remote watch: None

[Bug 660089] Re: nullmailer should not directly conflict with lsb

2011-03-25 Thread Marc Deslauriers
Thanks for reporting this issue. The best way for us to get this fixed in Ubuntu is to get it fixed in the upstream Debian package, and to sync the package to Ubuntu. Could you please file a bug in the upstream Debian bug tracker, and link the bug here? http://www.debian.org/Bugs/ Thanks! ** Al

[Bug 660089] Re: nullmailer should not directly conflict with lsb

2011-03-17 Thread Todd Vierling
JohnW, a version of nullmailer with this restriction removed is available in this PPA for Lucid, Maverick, and Natty: https://launchpad.net/~duh/+archive/duh -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/b

[Bug 660089] Re: nullmailer should not directly conflict with lsb

2011-03-17 Thread JohnWashington
Presumably this is why I've just encountered the following problem on 10.10 today? Thanks for your report Todd. root@ion:~# lsb_release No LSB modules are available. root@ion:~# aptitude install lsb The following NEW packages will be installed: alien{a} bsd-mailx{a} debhelper{a} gettext{a} html

[Bug 660089] Re: nullmailer should not directly conflict with lsb

2011-03-16 Thread Todd Vierling
Jonathan, it's not possible to install the "lsb" metapackage, which aids in building/maintaining some third-party source that is distro- independent, if nullmailer is installed (though it's possible to do so if other noncompliant MTAs are installed, such as ssmtp or the lsb- invalid-mta). -- You

[Bug 660089] Re: nullmailer should not directly conflict with lsb

2011-03-16 Thread Jonathan Riddell
What problem does this solve? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/660089 Title: nullmailer should not directly conflict with lsb -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 660089] Re: nullmailer should not directly conflict with lsb

2010-10-13 Thread Todd Vierling
** Patch added: "Conflicts change to debian/control" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/660089/+attachment/1691330/+files/nullmailer_1-1.04-1.2_1-1.04-1.2%2Bduh1.diff -- nullmailer should not directly conflict with lsb https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/660089 You received this bug notification be