** Changed in: openhackware (Debian)
Status: Won't Fix => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/64501
Title:
FTBFS
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://
This builds fine raring onwards
** Changed in: openhackware (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/64501
Title:
FTBFS
To manage notifications
With -fno-stack-protector in CFLAGS, the package builds; I tried
building the arch: all package during binary-arch on powerpc, but that
failed to upload; see bug #183495
** Changed in: openhackware (Ubuntu)
Importance: Critical => High
--
FTBFS
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/64501
You receiv
I tried a build on ppc (using an ugly hack) and got:
gcc -c -Wall -g -O2 -fno-builtin -fno-common -nostdinc -mregnames
-DBUILD_DATE=2010-03-22 -DBUILD_TIME=17:30:40 -Isrc/ -Isrc/libc/include
-I/usr/lib/gcc/powerpc-linux-gnu/4.4.3//include -Isrc/dev -Isrc/dev/block
-Isrc/dev/char -Isrc/dev/bus -
I see no such build, actually I see no builds or build attempts, just a
very old failed i386 build in *dapper* and nothing since.
(Reopening)
** Changed in: openhackware (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Released => Triaged
--
FTBFS
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/64501
You received this bug notifica
Marking this bug as Fix Released since it has been built successfully
quite a few times since this issue was reported.
** Changed in: openhackware (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Released
--
FTBFS
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/64501
You received this bug notification because you are a m
Openhackware doesn't seem to be in the Karmic repos so maybe it's no longer
supported?
Why is this bug critical and been open since 3 years? Shouldn't it be won't fix
instead?
--
FTBFS
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/64501
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bu
** Changed in: openhackware (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Reinhard Tartler (siretart) => (unassigned)
--
FTBFS
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/64501
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists
And openbios-sparc64... You can just copy these into
/usr/share/openhackware/ and you should be good to go.
** Attachment added: "openbios-sparc64"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19188790/openbios-sparc64
--
FTBFS
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/64501
You received this bug notification because
For those who don't have access to a ppc machine or a debian install,
here's openhackware-sparc32 from debian etch as of 2008-11-01 (attached)
** Attachment added: "openbios-sparc32"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19188747/openbios-sparc32
--
FTBFS
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/64501
You rec
While I could manually build this on powerpc, I will *not* manually
build it for every upload, no matter how infrequent they are.
Have a look at the palo source, which solves this in two ways:
1) When on hppa, debian/rules clean builds hppa-specific stuff (and the
source package is obviously alwa
** Changed in: openhackware (Debian)
Status: New => Won't Fix
--
FTBFS
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/64501
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://l
** Changed in: openhackware (Debian)
Status: Fix Released => New
--
FTBFS
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/64501
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https:
** Changed in: openhackware (Debian)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
FTBFS
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/64501
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https:
just to say some people are still expecting a bug fix ^^
--
FTBFS
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/64501
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.
See also Bug #60478 in qemu (Ubuntu)
--
FTBFS
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/64501
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo
Barry,
I agree with you about Ubuntu's responsibility. I was just commenting
that Ubuntu shouldn't allow a package to fester if the package
maintainer did not take responsibility for quality [seems to be the case
here]. On the contrary, Ubuntu would be justified in removing it ASAP
so as not dis
Richard,
Have you spoken to upstream? It is really not a distributions package
maintainer's job to actively develop the software, it is their job to
make sure the existing package works in it's current form in the
distribution. Everything I have read on this package openly states that
it was dev
Suggestion: Since Ubuntu is so close to Beta and I'll assume that there is
nothing critical that requires it, drop this package. One of two things will
happen:
1) Nothing - Ubuntu is no worse off than now.
2) The maintainer will find time to port to x86 etc.
-Richard
--
FTBFS
https://bugs.la
I'm subscribing this bug to Adam Conrad for now as suggested by Tollef.
Adam, feel free to unassign this bug from yourself if you feel there is
nothing you can do about this.
I'm mainly doing this because of lack of feedback on this.
** Changed in: openhackware (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned
subscribing infinity. Here releavant irc snippets (from #ubuntu-devel)
22:02:56 < siretart> Mithrandir: the problem seems to be that the package only
builds on ppc
22:03:09 < siretart> Mithrandir: and binary:all packages are built on i386 only
in ubuntu
22:03:30 < Mithrandir> siretart: how is th
Just fix the compilation parameters to make it compile. This has
nothing to do with ubuntu-archive; unsubscribing them.
--
FTBFS
https://launchpad.net/bugs/64501
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
well, that's it. The debian maintainer does not seem willing or able to
fix the bug. I talked to fabionne about this, and he promised me to talk
to elmo about this problem to get this problem resolved for dapper.
Nothing happend since then, and I lost this bug out of the mind as well,
so this is ma
So is it impossible for openhackware to compile if it's not on ppc
hardware? That seems unreasonable.
--
FTBFS
https://launchpad.net/bugs/64501
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
** Changed in: openhackware (Debian)
Status: Unknown => Unconfirmed
--
FTBFS
https://launchpad.net/bugs/64501
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
The problem is that the openhackware package expects ppc hardware to
build.
--
FTBFS
https://launchpad.net/bugs/64501
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
26 matches
Mail list logo
