[Bug 63172] Re: Better vimrc default

2009-06-22 Thread James Vega
Enabling syntax highlighting runs afoul of the same problem that caused me to stop enabling filetype plugins by default in the Debian package. It causes Vim to source various script from its runtimepath. This cannot be undone by the user and therefore makes the user unable to make certain configur

[Bug 63172] Re: Better vimrc default

2009-03-05 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package vim - 2:7.2.079-1ubuntu3 --- vim (2:7.2.079-1ubuntu3) jaunty; urgency=low * debian/runtime/vimrc: "syntax on" is a sane default for non-tiny vim, LP: #63172 -- Dustin KirklandThu, 05 Mar 2009 09:28:52 -0600 ** Changed in: vim (Ubuntu)

[Bug 63172] Re: Better vimrc default

2009-03-05 Thread Dustin Kirkland
I've uploaded a fix for this in Jaunty. However, I declined this for Hardy. I don't think that this rises to the merit for an SRU in Hardy. It's a simple configuration change, with a trivial work around. Cheers, :-Dustin -- Better vimrc default https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/63172 You receive

[Bug 63172] Re: Better vimrc default

2009-03-05 Thread Colin Watson
I agree regarding indentation. The description of this bug is not true; you just have to put 'set autoindent' in ~/.vimrc - not a big deal. IME the confusion caused by needing to do that is less than the confusion caused by people not realising that they need to do ':set paste' to paste things. Tu

[Bug 63172] Re: Better vimrc default

2009-03-05 Thread Dustin Kirkland
** Changed in: vim (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => In Progress -- Better vimrc default https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/63172 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com htt

[Bug 63172] Re: Better vimrc default

2009-02-17 Thread Dustin Kirkland
** Tags added: pet-bug -- Better vimrc default https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/63172 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubun

[Bug 63172] Re: Better vimrc default

2009-02-16 Thread Dustin Kirkland
Colin- Would you care to comment? What do you think? :-Dustin -- Better vimrc default https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/63172 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com http

[Bug 63172] Re: Better vimrc default

2009-02-16 Thread Dustin Kirkland
I'm confirming the "syntax on" portion of this bug. I think this is a very sane default when full vim is installed. The indentation part, though, is more controversial, I'm afraid. Too often vim doesn't do the correct thing. Or, more precisely, there is no universal "correct" indentation. I th

[Bug 63172] Re: Better vimrc default

2007-11-17 Thread Ajay
I vote for both auto-indent and color enabling. >>> I doubt we will be able to enable the syntax highlighting Well, I say, enable it, if the functionality is not available, the selection will not harm anything, now, would it ? (PS: I just spent the last 20 minutes, trying to find where the color

[Bug 63172] Re: Better vimrc default

2006-10-13 Thread Tolan Blundell
Is this the autoindent option? If so I find it incredibly annoying in a Debian install I sometimes have to work on, as it makes pasting code from another app impossible without first disabling the setting. -- Better vimrc default https://launchpad.net/bugs/63172 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubun

[Bug 63172] Re: Better vimrc default

2006-09-30 Thread Mateusz Drożdżyński
Thanks for your suggestion. I agree that activating the indentation might be a good idea, but I doubt we will be able to enable the syntax highlighting, since vim-full isn't installed by default what as far as I know strips out the highlighting functionality. ** Changed in: vim (Ubuntu) Importa