This bug was fixed in the package system-tools-backends -
2.9.4-0ubuntu1.1
---
system-tools-backends (2.9.4-0ubuntu1.1) lucid-proposed; urgency=low
* debian/patches/03-lp616682.patch: backport fixes from 2.10.0 to fix
various issues (LP: #616682):
- Fix crash on authenticati
I have successfully tested the package in -proposed. With the updated
package, I was able to add and remove users, change parameters, etc.
** Tags added: verification-done
** Tags removed: verification-needed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which i
Any testers of the lucid-proposed package? As this has been in -proposed
for a long time already, I'll remove the proposed package soon if there
is no feedback. Thank you!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.la
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/lucid-proposed/system-tools-backends
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/616682
Title:
Backport system-tools-backends 2.10.0 to Lucid
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing l
Accepted system-tools-backends into lucid-proposed, the package will
build now and be available in a few hours. Please test and give feedback
here. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for
documentation how to enable and use -proposed. Thank you in advance!
** Tags added: verificatio
@Martin:
Ah! I didn't know I could do that. I just re-uploaded with a fixed
changelog. Thanks!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/616682
Title:
Backport system-tools-backends 2.10.0 to L
Marc Deslauriers [2010-12-06 15:18 -]:
> Thanks for taking a look. Unfortunately, I have already uploaded it to
> -proposed.
For the record, you can just upload again with the fixed changelog
(same version number), I'll reject the previous one once I get to
reviewing the queue.
--
You recei
No, I don't think it is. ;-) As long as the right number is listed...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/616682
Title:
Backport system-tools-backends 2.10.0 to Lucid
--
ubuntu-bugs mail
Thanks for taking a look. Unfortunately, I have already uploaded it to
-proposed.
I don't think it's worth another upload just to fix the changelog.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/61668
Thanks for the diff!
Looks good to me, except that the change log line:
- Identify users and groups by login instead of UID (LP: #533870, LP: #542183)
is wrong: Bug 533870 is a crash on amd64 too, not a login vs. UID issue.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
I've prepared an SRU for lucid based on a minimal backport from 2.10.0.
See the attached debdiff.
** Patch added: "debdiff for SRU"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/system-tools-backends/+bug/616682/+attachment/1757391/+files/system-tools-backends_2.9.4-0ubuntu1.1.debdiff
** Changed
Looks ok, please upload. Thanks, Milan and Chris!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/616682
Title:
Backport system-tools-backends 2.10.0 to Lucid
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs
Thanks Chris! But we really don't need to backport 2.10.1, 2.10.0 will
be enough. 2.10.1 only brings in a few improvements that are used by the
gnome-system-tools 2.32, which are not in Lucid. This removes most of
the changes (in terms of lines of code), which makes the SRU even safer.
--
Backpor
This is basically the upstream diff, minus autotools cruft and
translations, which looks much more palatable
** Attachment added: "diff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/system-tools-backends/+bug/616682/+attachment/1751156/+files/diff
--
Backport system-tools-backends 2.10.0 to Luc
Seriously, I've moved on to other things since Lucid has been released -
glad to know SRUs are considered even when they are that old, though!
;-)
The only translation change between Lucid and Maverick package is in one
file and for two strings, so definitely not something to care about. If
somebo
Thanks for this suggestion! I think that the easiest way to move this
forward (i.e. the way most likely to be accepted) would be to prepare a
targeted backport of just the bug-fixes, without things like whitespace
changes, translation updates (which would need to go in language packs
for an Ubuntu
I've marked the main task invalid since this is already in Maverick, but
approved the Lucid task so that this bug remains open.
** Also affects: system-tools-backends (Ubuntu Lucid)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: system-tools-backends (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Inv
** Attachment added: "system-tools-backends_2.9.4-0ubuntu1_2.10.0-2.diff.gz"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/616682/+attachment/1485650/+files/system-tools-backends_2.9.4-0ubuntu1_2.10.0-2.diff.gz
** Changed in: system-tools-backends (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
** Description c
18 matches
Mail list logo
