[Bug 615899] Re: fsck.ext4 marks FS clean when still damaged

2011-09-29 Thread vandyswa
Please close, as that server no longer exists and it doesn't happen elsewhere. It very possibly could just have been hardware issues. Thanks. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/615899 Titl

[Bug 615899] Re: fsck.ext4 marks FS clean when still damaged

2011-09-29 Thread Theodore Ts'o
Without more information, should we close this particular bug as unreproducible? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/615899 Title: fsck.ext4 marks FS clean when still damaged To manage no

[Bug 615899] Re: fsck.ext4 marks FS clean when still damaged

2010-08-11 Thread Theodore Ts'o
There are around 100 tests in e2fsprogs which test various file system corruptions. Please they are in the e2fsprogs/tests/f_* sub directories. Each include a smallish file system, and then the expected output after the first and second fsck run. Note that Ubuntu saves fsck output in /var/log/

[Bug 615899] Re: fsck.ext4 marks FS clean when still damaged

2010-08-10 Thread vandyswa
Thanks. This was certainly standalone (root fsck failed during bootup sequence), so either HW or SW bug. I will be swapping the server out in about a week, and will look at putting a second drive in so I can dd an image before fsck'ing. Then, assuming it's SW and not HW, I should be able to repr

[Bug 615899] Re: fsck.ext4 marks FS clean when still damaged

2010-08-10 Thread Theodore Ts'o
The regression testing for e2fsck already involves running it a second time to make sure the file system is truly clean. That is certainly something we strive for. If you get errors after running e2fsck -y (i.e., you say yes to fix all corruptions), then one of the following is true: (a) the ha