[Bug 61535] Re: usplash progress reporting is not very accurate for casper

2007-11-13 Thread Matt Zimmerman
(I've filed said issue as bug #162397) -- usplash progress reporting is not very accurate for casper https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/61535 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lis

Re: [Bug 61535] Re: usplash progress reporting is not very accurate for casper

2007-04-05 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 05:34:10PM -, Michael wrote: > I don't know if this quite fits in here, but I will add it anyway. > Currently, during boot of an installed system, the first part of the > bootsplash is very slow to start moving, and a new user might think > their machine has frozen. Som

[Bug 61535] Re: usplash progress reporting is not very accurate for casper

2007-03-28 Thread Michael
I don't know if this quite fits in here, but I will add it anyway. Currently, during boot of an installed system, the first part of the bootsplash is very slow to start moving, and a new user might think their machine has frozen. Some sort of indication (anything moving on the screen would do real

Re: [Bug 61535] Re: usplash progress reporting is not very accurate for casper

2006-10-10 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Mon, Oct 09, 2006 at 11:02:28AM -, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > * Matt Zimmerman > > | On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 12:31:11PM -, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > | >* Force suspend and hibernate both off, since reconfiguring > | > gnome-power-manager kills usplash here. Fixes Malone: #61535 >

Re: [Bug 61535] Re: usplash progress reporting is not very accurate for casper

2006-10-09 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
* Matt Zimmerman | On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 12:31:11PM -, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: | >* Force suspend and hibernate both off, since reconfiguring | > gnome-power-manager kills usplash here. Fixes Malone: #61535 | > completely. | | It's useful to be able to test suspend to RAM usin

Re: [Bug 61535] Re: usplash progress reporting is not very accurate for casper

2006-10-06 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 12:31:11PM -, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: >* Force suspend and hibernate both off, since reconfiguring > gnome-power-manager kills usplash here. Fixes Malone: #61535 > completely. It's useful to be able to test suspend to RAM using the live CD. Can this be fi

[Bug 61535] Re: usplash progress reporting is not very accurate for casper

2006-10-06 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
* Force suspend and hibernate both off, since reconfiguring gnome-power-manager kills usplash here. Fixes Malone: #61535 completely. ** Changed in: casper (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Released -- usplash progress reporting is not very accurate for casper https://laun

[Bug 61535] Re: usplash progress reporting is not very accurate for casper

2006-10-05 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
Marking as in-progress since this is hopefully-fixed but might need a bit more work. ** Changed in: casper (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => In Progress -- usplash progress reporting is not very accurate for casper https://launchpad.net/bugs/61535 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@li

[Bug 61535] Re: usplash progress reporting is not very accurate for casper

2006-10-05 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
Latest upload: casper (1.71) edgy; urgency=low * Use TEXT-URGENT in shutdown script to make sure we display the "please remove disc and press enter" text. Malone: #61533 * Increase usplash timeout since "TIMEOUT 0" no longer means "spin forever". * Don't move-mount all the squashfs

Re: [Bug 61535] Re: usplash progress reporting is not very accurate for casper

2006-09-26 Thread Dennis Kaarsemaker
On di, 2006-09-26 at 18:18 +, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > Looking at it, it doesn't seem very accurate for a number of other > configurations as well. I think the approach used for ticking the > progress bar in initramfs isn't adequate and this needs a rethink. > Please look into this in detail af

[Bug 61535] Re: usplash progress reporting is not very accurate for casper

2006-09-26 Thread Matt Zimmerman
Looking at it, it doesn't seem very accurate for a number of other configurations as well. I think the approach used for ticking the progress bar in initramfs isn't adequate and this needs a rethink. Please look into this in detail after beta. ** Changed in: casper (Ubuntu) Target: ubuntu-

[Bug 61535] Re: usplash progress reporting is not very accurate for casper

2006-09-22 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
** Changed in: casper (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Tollef Fog Heen -- usplash progress reporting is not very accurate for casper https://launchpad.net/bugs/61535 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 61535] Re: usplash progress reporting is not very accurate for casper

2006-09-20 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
** Bug 40029 has been marked a duplicate of this bug -- usplash progress reporting is not very accurate for casper https://launchpad.net/bugs/61535 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs