Untitled No. 4, see bug 459275.
--
Fax PPD not installed by default
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/59409
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/
Yes, this bug has seem to have made a comeback in 9.10 (I'm using
Kubuntu).
To resolve the issue you need to run
sudo aptitude install hplip-cups
and install the printer again.
** Changed in: hplip (Ubuntu Hardy)
Status: Fix Released => New
** Changed in: hplip (Ubuntu Hardy)
Statu
Hello there,
I read above with interest, BUT...
Note: My HP Officejet Pro L7590 is connected to my LAN.
1- In my previous Ubuntu 9.04 after having installed HPLIP (v. ?) from
Ubuntu depositories, launched it and used its Device Manager - Setup
Device... I was able without any problem to detect my
** Changed in: hplip
Importance: Undecided => Medium
Assignee: (unassigned) => Aaron Albright (kalosaurusrex)
Status: In Progress => Fix Released
--
Fax PPD not installed by default
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/59409
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
** Changed in: hplip (Debian)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
Fax PPD not installed by default
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/59409
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lis
** Changed in: hplip (Debian)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
Fax PPD not installed by default
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/59409
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu
** Changed in: hplip (Debian)
Status: Unknown => New
--
Fax PPD not installed by default
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/59409
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.c
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #454341
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=454341
** Also affects: hplip (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=454341
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
Fax PPD not installed by default
https://bugs.
It seems there is a misunderstanding.
I didn't ask for a place to where I can submit
something for HPLIP.
I asked if there is a summary page of all currently
available patches for a certain HPLIP version.
--
Fax PPD not installed by default
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/59409
You received thi
The official feedback place for HPLIP is the Launchpad. Report a bug to
the project "HPLIP" with the patch attached.
--
Fax PPD not installed by default
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/59409
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
By chance I noticed that there are patches avaialble.
I have a question and/or feature request:
Is there an official developer location (web page, URL)
where such patches are collected so that
it would be sufficient to check only one URL
to get all the latest currently available patches
for a cer
Don, I have added you patches to the Debian SVN for HPLIP now, so they
get into the next packages for sure.
--
Fax PPD not installed by default
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/59409
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubu
Don, thank you very much for the two patches. I will apply them to the
Ubuntu and Debian packages of HPLIP soon.
** Changed in: hplip
Status: New => In Progress
--
Fax PPD not installed by default
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/59409
You received this bug notification because you are a
Here's that patch...
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 3:36 PM, dwelch91 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oh, sorry, I missed that.
>
> -Don
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 3:10 PM, Till Kamppeter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > Thank you for the patch, I will apply it to the next Ubuntu release of
> > the HP
Oh, sorry, I missed that.
-Don
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 3:10 PM, Till Kamppeter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Thank you for the patch, I will apply it to the next Ubuntu release of
> the HPLIP package. Please note that your patch is not complete, also in
> the fax PPD for "HP Fax 2" the device ID
Thank you for the patch, I will apply it to the next Ubuntu release of
the HPLIP package. Please note that your patch is not complete, also in
the fax PPD for "HP Fax 2" the device ID has to be changed to
"MFG:HP;MDL:Fax 2;DES:HP Fax 2;" (Note the MDL part, it must be "Fax 2".
--
Fax PPD not inst
Hpfax: (hpfax.py) patch for 2.8.2 to add proper pseudo ID and PPD matching
(attached).
-Don
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 2:35 AM, Launchpad Bug Tracker <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This bug was fixed in the package hplip - 2.8.2-0ubuntu2
>
> ---
> hplip (2.8.2-0ubuntu2) hardy; urgency=lo
This bug was fixed in the package hplip - 2.8.2-0ubuntu2
---
hplip (2.8.2-0ubuntu2) hardy; urgency=low
[ Till Kamppeter ]
* debian/rules: Install the new fax PPD file for color fax devices
(currently only HP LaserJet M2727 series, Ubuntu LP: #59409).
* debian/hplip.postinst:
My HP LaserJet 3390 produces the following output:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/ubuntu/hplip/svn/pkg-hpijs/hplip/build-area$
/usr/lib/cups/backend/hpfax
direct hpfax:/usb/HP_LaserJet_3390?serial=00CNMJP81545 "HP Fax" "HP LaserJet
3390 HP Fax HPLIP" "MFG:HP;MDL:Fax;DES:HP Fax;"
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/ubuntu/
Till, do you want hpfax: backend to return the MDL: of "Fax" and "Fax 2" or
the actual MDL: of the discovered device? Could you please provide a sample
of what you'd like to see?
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 9:54 AM, Till Kamppeter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Don, I have found the second fax file no
Don, thank you for the first part of your answer. I will add the HP
LaserJet M2727 NFS to my shopping list.
I have fixed the problem in the Ubuntu and Debian HPLIP packages on the
Debian SVN now. Once the missing Fax 2 will get installed now and
second, the /etc/hp/hplip.conf file will be correcte
I am using HP Photosmart 3310. I can't check it atm but I'll report back
if I have the possibility.
--
Fax PPD not installed by default
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/59409
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
The two PPD files are:
-rw-rw-rw- 1 dwelch dwelch 5207 2007-12-04 14:56 HP-Fax2-hplip.ppd
-rw-rw-rw- 1 dwelch dwelch 5197 2007-12-04 14:58 HP-Fax-hplip.ppd
HP-Fax2-hplip.ppd is for these models (as of 2.8.2):
hp_laserjet_m2727_mfp
hp_laserjet_m2727nf_mfp
hp_laserjet_m2727nfs_mfp
HP-Fax-hplip.ppd
unggnu, please tell also which printer model you have.
--
Fax PPD not installed by default
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/59409
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
ht
Don, I have found the second fax file now in the source tree:
fax/ppd/HP-Fax2-hplip.ppd
The pseudo device ID is:
MFG:HP;MDL:Fax;DES:HP Fax 2;
I suggest to modify it to
MFG:HP;MDL:Fax 2;DES:HP Fax 2;
as otherwise MFG and MDL are identical and so a printer setup tool which
starts checking alrea
Don, what are the names of the two PPD files, where are they in the
source tree, where do they get installed, and what are there pseudo
device IDs? The device IDs should be different, hpfax should output the
pseudo device ID so that CUPS selects the correct PPD and also the
Nicknames and other PPD
Don, Aaron, Raghu: My suggestion is that also the fax PPD should be
assigned by CUPS, so if it floats around in the future HPLIP versions it
will not depend on a path hard-coded into a config file. The assignment
of the fax PPD by CUPS is used in the CUPS web interface and in system-
config-printer
unggnu can you update to the current version of HPLIP (do a full update
of your Hardy) and then try hp-setup again?
If it does not work, post /etc/hp/hplip.conf here and then edit it to
have the lines
ppd=/usr/share/ppd/hpijs/HP
ppdbase=/usr/share/ppd/hpijs
Then try hp-setup again.
Post also yo
In the last packaging (2.8.2-0ubuntu1) I have removed all code which
modifies the fax PPD from debian/rules. So the fax PPD is OK in the
HPLIP package from the mentioned version on.
My /etc/hp/hplip.conf contains
ppd=/usr/share/ppd/hpijs/HP
ppdbase=/usr/share/ppd/hpijs
and with this hp-setup fin
Please keep in mind that, starting with HPLIP 2.8.2, there are two (2) Fax
PPD files required for HPLIP Fax functionality (the second one handles a
different class of fax device that requires different parameters for
rendering).
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 6:01 AM, Henrik Nilsen Omma <[EMAIL PROTECTE
Till, people are reporting this as not fixed in Hardy. It would be a
nice Hardy-fix though -- bumping the priority.
** Changed in: hplip (Ubuntu)
Importance: Low => Medium
--
Fax PPD not installed by default
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/59409
You received this bug notification because you
I can confirm that this still happens in current Hardy.
** Changed in: hplip (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Released => Confirmed
--
Fax PPD not installed by default
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/59409
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug co
hp-setup relies on the internal nickname of the PPD file to be a certain
string. If this is changed during packaging, either the code in hp-setup
will have to be changed, or it will not properly recognize the file.
On Feb 6, 2008 1:37 PM, Fabián Rodríguez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am using
I am using Hardy Alpha 4 and still have this problem.
Click on the "browse to file" button at the error dialog shows an HP Fax PPD
archive in the /usr/share/ppd/hpijs/HP/ directory but choosing it brings back
another error:
"error: Incorrect fax PPD file. The fax PPD file must have a nickname of
henrik, now where the bug is fixed in Hardy, can you accept the
nomination for Gutsy or at least allow nominating it again? I think this
bug is a good SRU candidate.
--
Fax PPD not installed by default
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/59409
You received this bug notification because you are a memb
Will there be an update for Gutsy with this fix?
--
Fax PPD not installed by default
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/59409
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
ht
hplip (2.7.10-5ubuntu1) hardy; urgency=low
* Merge with Debian unstable. No remaining Ubuntu changes.
* debian/rules: Added "--with-hpppddir=\$${prefix}/share/ppd/hpijs/HP" to
"./configure" call so that "hp-setup" will find the fax PPD (Ubuntu bug
LP: #59409).
* debian/rules: Removed
** Changed in: hplip (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
Fax PPD not installed by default
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/59409
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu
** Changed in: hplip (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => In Progress
--
Fax PPD not installed by default
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/59409
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@
Dave, thank you. After hand-editing /etc/hp/hplip.conf to have the line
ppd=/usr/share/ppd/hpijs/HP/
creating a fax queue with hp-setup is no problem.
So I will let the package build with
./configure --with-hpppdir=/usr/share/ppd/hpijs/HP/
now and it should work out-of-the-box.
** Changed in
Till,
hp-setup should be using the "ppd" key value pair in hplip.conf to determine
were the HP-Fax-hplip.ppd directory is. The "ppd" key value is set by the hplip
configure time option "--with-hpppddir". The "--with-hpppdir" is where the
Fax-hplip.ppd file is installed at "make install" time.
I
hp-setup uses the CUPS call CUPS_GET_PPDS to get the list of PPDs. My
assumption is that this is the same list that lpinfo -m gives (it
appears to be).
--
Fax PPD not installed by default
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/59409
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
B
hp-setup uses the path stored in /etc/hp/hplip.conf to locate the fax
PPD file. For example:
[dirs]
home=/usr/share/hplip
run=/var/run
ppd=/usr/share/ppd/HP
ppdbase=/usr/share/ppd
doc=/usr/share/doc/hplip-2.7.12.0
icon=/usr/share/applications
cupsbackend=/usr/lib/cups/backend
foomatic=/usr/share/f
Aaron, the problem is the following:
If CUPS is asked for listing PPDs ("lpinfo -m" or equivalent IPP call),
the returned paths are not necessarily real file system paths. They are
more to understand as PPD URIs. To get safely any arbitrary PPD CUPS
reports to you, you have to ask CUPS to give you
Till--I was going to submit a seperate bug however found this one and I
think they are related. I'll also send this to the rest of the team and
see if they have any thoughts on it.
Issue:
Using the pre-installed HPLIP to configure a printer (in this case photosmart
3310) the hp-setup is not cor
The PPD file is in place and provided by the hpijs package which should
be in the standard installation:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/ubuntu/cupsys$ dpkg -S
/usr/share/ppd/hpijs/HP/HP-Fax-hplip.ppd.gz
hpijs: /usr/share/ppd/hpijs/HP/HP-Fax-hplip.ppd.gz
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/ubuntu/cupsys$
Strange thing is
Dave, Raghu, Don, it seems that hp-setup searches for the fax PPD at
another place than CUPS:
hp-setup: /usr/lib/hplip/fax/HP-Fax-hplip.ppd
CUPS: /usr/share/ppd/hpijs/HP/HP-Fax-hplip.ppd.gz
Can you make hp-setup searching at the same place as CUPS to eliminate
needing two copies of the PPD?
--
Till, can you check if this is a regression from Edgy/Feisty to Gutsy
(or am I mistaken in thinking that it did work at some point)?
** Changed in: hplip (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Low
Assignee: (unassigned) => Till Kamppeter (till-kamppeter)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
Fa
This happens again in Gutsy. While installing my printer with fax functionality
I got the error "Unable to find HP fax PPD file. - Please check your HPLIP
installation and try again.".
I have searched for this file and it seems that one file has been deleted since
Feisty. Maybe that is the probl
As the Fax PPD is not generated by Foomatic data we have decided to move
it into the hpijs sub-package which makes part of the standard
installation. Now it is always available.
** Changed in: hplip (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
Fax PPD not installed by default
https://lau
ubuntu-desktop used to have a dependency on hpijs-ppds making it install
by default but this was removed on 29 Aug.
ubuntu-meta (1.17) edgy; urgency=low
* Refreshed dependencies
* Removed hpijs-ppds from desktop-i386, desktop-amd64, desktop-
powerpc, desktop-ia64, desktop-sparc, desktop-h
51 matches
Mail list logo
