[Bug 580221] Re: mc directory sizes not reliable

2010-09-28 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: mc Status: New => Confirmed -- mc directory sizes not reliable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/580221 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https:/

[Bug 580221] Re: mc directory sizes not reliable

2010-09-15 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: mc Status: Unknown => New -- mc directory sizes not reliable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/580221 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://l

[Bug 580221] Re: mc directory sizes not reliable

2010-09-15 Thread Yury V. Zaytsev
** Changed in: mc Importance: Unknown => Undecided ** Changed in: mc Status: Confirmed => New ** Changed in: mc Remote watch: www.midnight-commander.org/ #7 => None ** Bug watch added: Midnight Commander Bug Tracker #2088 http://midnight-commander.org/ticket/2088 ** Changed in: mc

[Bug 580221] Re: mc directory sizes not reliable

2010-08-15 Thread Yury V. Zaytsev
** Changed in: mc (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Yury V. Zaytsev (zyv) -- mc directory sizes not reliable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/580221 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu

[Bug 580221] Re: mc directory sizes not reliable

2010-08-13 Thread Yury V. Zaytsev
** Changed in: mc (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress -- mc directory sizes not reliable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/580221 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.

[Bug 580221] Re: mc directory sizes not reliable

2010-08-12 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: mc Status: Unknown => Confirmed -- mc directory sizes not reliable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/580221 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com htt

[Bug 580221] Re: mc directory sizes not reliable

2010-08-12 Thread Yury V. Zaytsev
** Bug watch added: www.midnight-commander.org/ #7 http://www.midnight-commander.org/ticket/7 ** Also affects: mc via http://www.midnight-commander.org/ticket/7 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- mc directory sizes not reliable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/580221 You recei

[Bug 580221] Re: mc directory sizes not reliable

2010-05-19 Thread Blue
I understand what you say. Unfortunately the new behaviour is not intuitive at all IMHO. Select ".." to count the CURRENT directory ? Hope a smarter way is found. I will also try to recheck the network fs mc vs du issue if i will be able to reproduce it. -- mc directory sizes not reliable http

[Bug 580221] Re: mc directory sizes not reliable

2010-05-19 Thread Yury V. Zaytsev
Will you read my previous message explaining the new behavior before posting more follow-ups to this bug? I explained the new behavior and my explanation is consistent with your screencasts. I will have a look at how to find a best compromise between the old mc behavior and the new FAR-like behavio

[Bug 580221] Re: mc directory sizes not reliable

2010-05-19 Thread Blue
Well, EVEN SO it fails, because it sometimes calculates (as previously expected) the sizes for all the content in the current directory and in other cases it does compute any sizes AT ALL or just limits itself to count only ONE directory from all the (sub)directories in the current directory. In

[Bug 580221] Re: mc directory sizes not reliable

2010-05-19 Thread Yury V. Zaytsev
This is not really a bug, but rather a change in the behavior of the "Show directory sizes" command. Previously it would calculate the sizes of all directories in the current directory if no selection was made, otherwise the size of the selected directories. Now if the cursor is positioned on a fi

[Bug 580221] Re: mc directory sizes not reliable

2010-05-18 Thread Blue
...another recording of the same issue, this time on a nfs mounted directory. It is clearly visible how mc itself forgets the correct size from one interrogation to another. ** Attachment added: "screencast-mc-dircount2.ogv" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48680411/screencast-mc-dircount2.ogv -

[Bug 580221] Re: mc directory sizes not reliable

2010-05-18 Thread Blue
Please see the attached screen cast. See how I descend in my home, in .gimp-2.4 and in .gimp-2.4 i run directory count. Then, i go back to the parent directory (which is my home directory ) and run directory count there, too. Instead of counting that directory, mc limits itself to displaying ON

[Bug 580221] Re: mc directory sizes not reliable

2010-05-18 Thread Blue
Let me reissue : we have the following structure : A |-- B | |-- X | |-- Y | |-- Z | |-- file1 | |-- file2 | `-- file3 |-- C | |-- file1 | |-- file2 | `-- file3 |-- D |-- E `-- F We enter directory B and request directory sizes. mc will count everything that resides in director

[Bug 580221] Re: mc directory sizes not reliable

2010-05-18 Thread Yury V. Zaytsev
How do you know that what du reports to you is always OK??? You didn't seem to have performed any independent validation for this. As I mentioned above du on a cifs-mounted filesystem is clearly bullshitting me, showing that a 9 mb directory takes 231 mb. mc's output, however, is consistent with th

[Bug 580221] Re: mc directory sizes not reliable

2010-05-17 Thread Blue
How could be the bug invalid if du's reporting is always ok ? It can however be reproduced on the local filesystem. I am able to reproduce locally in many cases using the following scenario : 1). Go to a populated and loaded directory. For example a quite heavily used user home. 2). Enter one sub

[Bug 580221] Re: mc directory sizes not reliable

2010-05-17 Thread Yury V. Zaytsev
I had the same effect on //xxx/yyy on /media/calculon type cifs (rw,mand,noexec,nosuid,nodev,user=zyv) mc shows the directory size of 9 mb, but du -ch shows 231 mb. If I copy this folder to the local file system, the size matches. I think it's a du's problem, not mc. Try to compare with Nautilus

[Bug 580221] Re: mc directory sizes not reliable

2010-05-17 Thread Yury V. Zaytsev
Unfortunately I was able to reproduce this issue. I will submit this upstream. -- mc directory sizes not reliable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/580221 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-

[Bug 580221] Re: mc directory sizes not reliable

2010-05-15 Thread Blue
...not only on nfs after all (see screenshot). ** Attachment added: "mc.jpg" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48513935/mc.jpg -- mc directory sizes not reliable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/580221 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 580221] Re: mc directory sizes not reliable

2010-05-14 Thread Blue
I tried your package from your ppa and seems to do the same. However I might have missed something : it seems that this unreliability manifests itself on nfs mounted directories with quite a large number of files (and megabytes ...) -- mc directory sizes not reliable https://bugs.launchpad.net/

[Bug 580221] Re: mc directory sizes not reliable

2010-05-14 Thread Yury V. Zaytsev
I can't reproduce this with my packages, which probably means that the issue has already been fixed and will make it into Ubuntu / Debian when our package will get uploaded. https://launchpad.net/~zyv/+archive/ppa -- mc directory sizes not reliable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/580221 You rece