I mean "Private" does make good sense for a subdirectory provided to
users to keep files private from other users of the system, regardless
if it is (on-disk) encrypted or not.
--
The default ~/Private name is not very clear
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/575096
You received this bug notificatio
I see, thank your the message.
Indeed, "Private" makes a nice contrast with "Public", but to keeping
something "Private" within a filesystem isn't necessarily much connected
with on-disk-encryption at all, or would you think otherwise?
I do understand we're not going to change the default crypt-d
When I first proposed the feature at UDS Prague in May 2008, I
suggested "Confidential". The Ubuntu core development team instead
settled on "Private", as it made for a nice contrast with the "Public"
directory.
I seriously doubt that this default is going to change. If you would
like to discuss
Thanks, that is very good you already implemented the path to be
configurable.
The issue here is more about the particular default, though.
People using the "user private group" scheme (used and advocated for
user collaboration in debian/ubuntu system, but still broken due to some
minor bugs) use
You can rename that to whatever you want, in ~/.ecryptfs/Private.mnt.
** Changed in: ecryptfs-utils (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Won't Fix
--
The default ~/Private name is not very clear
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/575096
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubunt
