express bugs cleaned up, wiki updated... automatic apport bug
reporting... looks like this old bug can be closed out.
** Changed in: ubiquity (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to U
** Changed in: ubiquity (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Colin Watson (cjwatson) => (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/57189
Title:
Unobvious where to report Ubuntu installation probl
Przemysław Kulczycki: many of the issues I enumerated in the original
bug report are still open, but perhaps this bug can be closed, and a new
one opened against Launchpad and/or the wiki documentation. Perhaps
this is more Brainstorm stuff now (that didn't exist when I filed the
bug, either).
--
Ubuntu is now using Apport for semiautomatic bug reporting. Does this
bug still apply?
--
Unobvious where to report Ubuntu installation problems
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/57189
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ub
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/ubiquity", line 166, in ?
main()
File "/usr/bin/ubiquity", line 161, in main
install(sys.argv[1])
File "/usr/bin/ubiquity", line 57, in install
ret = wizard.run()
File "/usr/lib/ubiquity/ubiquity/frontend/kde-ui.py", line 338, in
I agree with you on that, but the bugtracker itself is not suitable for
this. If you could make a summary of the most frightening things in
malone, given what you've read on the forums, I'm sure the launchpad
people can fix that.
--
Unobvious where to report Ubuntu installation problems
https://l
The dominating problem is making sure that reporting a bug is not so
frustrating that it doesn't happen in the first place. The threshold is
already rather high among users (look in the forums for examples, every
day; ubuntuforums.org is a good place to start) and the problem is
exacerbated if addi
era: there are a few bug triagers active who read incoming bugreports.
One of their tasks is making sure that a bug is filed aginst the correct
source package.
--
Unobvious where to report Ubuntu installation problems
https://launchpad.net/bugs/57189
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@list
I've removed ubuntu-express from edgy, which should help (it was an
oversight that it wasn't removed from dapper):
=
[Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 11:52:54 +0100] [ftpmaster: Launchpad Archive Manager]
Removed the following packages
Might want to go over the ubuntu-meta bugs also, there's a number there
which would seem to belong somewhere else, and maybe think about adding
a hint or a description to the ubuntu-meta package like you did for the
ubuntu-installer team, if possible.
--
Unobvious where to report Ubuntu installat
Excellent progress; the audience cheers!
--
Unobvious where to report Ubuntu installation problems
https://launchpad.net/bugs/57189
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
I've updated https://launchpad.net/people/ubuntu-installer and
http://wiki.ubuntu.com/InstallerTeam with a bit more information. I hope
that helps.
** Changed in: ubiquity (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Colin Watson
Status: Fix Released => Confirmed
--
Unobvious where to report U
There is no single installer that's current. Both debian-installer and
ubiquity are used for different purposes.
--
Unobvious where to report Ubuntu installation problems
https://launchpad.net/bugs/57189
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/l
I've cleaned up the remaining two ubuntu-express bugs.
--
Unobvious where to report Ubuntu installation problems
https://launchpad.net/bugs/57189
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
"Fix released"? Come on, even if that guide was changed, the problem
would not be fixed. I have enumerated a bunch of things you could do to
rectify the situation at least slightly, most of which only incidentally
involve a little documentation. For the most part, you should assume
that people will
Ubiquity often tells you to file bugs against it when things go wrong.
Sadly, it's difficult for someone to determine which part of the
installation process is failing. We try to sort bugs into the right place.
Of course, adding documentation is a good thing, but there really
isn't an official d
16 matches
Mail list logo
