[Bug 564699] Re: Calling the package 'default-jdk' is not user friendly

2010-05-13 Thread Niels Thykier
Hi again and sorry for the late reply, That is an interesting experiment. :) Getting java installed by default is not likely to happen. Java runtimes are not exactly "cheap" space-wise and a lot of setups do not need it. Technically it is possible to rename the packages themselves, but it is no

[Bug 564699] Re: Calling the package 'default-jdk' is not user friendly

2010-04-25 Thread hasan adil
Hi, Thanks for the excellent explanation and I can see why its named as it is. I setup an experiment with a friend who is not a tech user and was recording what usability issues she runs into with Ubuntu (without any other person to help her) and this was one of them. So asked on her behalf and

[Bug 564699] Re: Calling the package 'default-jdk' is not user friendly

2010-04-24 Thread Niels Thykier
Hi Most JVMs (including Oracle/Sun's java and openjdk-6) have more than one variant. For instance openjdk-6 ships a server variant (see man java or java -help), which makes the JVM assume that will be run for "long periods of time". It also has a client variant that attempts to reduce start-up