"but after grub a complete black screen without cursor appears for more
then 10 seconds"
Seems that, "sudo echo FRAMEBUFFER=y > /etc/initramfs-tools/conf.d/splash"
and "sudo update-initramfs -u" works...
--
Ubuntu splashscreen big and ugly after installing ATI graphics driver
https://bugs.launch
I have tried above workaround:
echo FRAMEBUFFER=y > sudo tee /etc/initramfs-tools/conf.d/splash
sudo update-initramfs -u
GRUB_GFXPAYLOAD_LINUX=1024x768
sudo update-grub2
but it didn't solve the problem for me. The size of the logo was ok
again after applying the workaround but after grub a comple
Here's a workaround that solved the problem for me:
1) enable framebuffer mode:
echo FRAMEBUFFER=y > sudo tee /etc/initramfs-tools/conf.d/splash
sudo update-initramfs -u
2) add this line to /etc/default/grub (The resolution has to be
supported by BIOS. To check, execute vbeinfo at grub2 prompt.)
I really hope this gets an official fix as this is an LTS release.
The longer Ubuntu leaves this unsolved users will be left to
find their own methods and means, which could result in
more problems should an official fix ever be released.
Many of the workarounds suggested by editing entries
in th
I'm also affected on NVidia GeForce Go 6100 using a proprietary driver
from repos. I haven't tried any workarounds yet because I am faithfully
expecting a fix released soon. The extra 6 seconds of boot time is not a
problem for me because due to another bug in Karmic my boot process used
to freeze
* what testing was done before transitioning to 'plymouth' for lucid was green
lighted for an LTS of all things
* why did Canonical not investigate the true number of users affected
* do we expect this to be resolved for lucid
* if not, what do we need to do to prove there is community interest in
Perso, my ATI graphics driver has lousy performance with the open source
driver. People who have graphics cards want to be able to use them.
Reverting to a lower quality driver to enjoy a boot splash that lasts
only a few seconds, thereby suffering a mediocre desktop experience
seems completely ri
@silicon.shaman
Unless the corruption problem occurs to everyone who is experiencing the
resolution problem, I would categorize that as a separate bug.
--
Ubuntu splashscreen big and ugly after installing ATI graphics driver
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563878
You received this bug notificati
@silicon.shaman By disabling the proprietary graphics driver, you're
avoiding this bug, not solving it. According to its duplicates, this bug
applies to proprietary graphics drivers in general, not just ATI.
--
Ubuntu splashscreen big and ugly after installing ATI graphics driver
https://bugs.lau
@Jeff Sereno
It's more than an appearance problem, at least on my system. The ATI driver
kept corrupting the boot loader itself, so I couldn't reboot more than a couple
of times before it failed and I needed to reinstall.
As I said, uninstalling it fixed the image appearance and the memory leak
Solution to this problem seems to be to uninstall the ATI driver. It not
only resolves the problem with the plymouth logo, but also means the
system can auto-detect monitor type correctly, 3d effects are enabled
[where supported] and as far as I can tell, run faster. More importantly
though.. it s
@Jeff Sereno
"Given that Lucid's total boot times have decreased to 9-15 seconds on the
average modern system, that the splash screen is only on screen for a fraction
of this time, and that the end-user will ultimately spend more time indulging
the eye-candy of the desktop, I think this is a ver
Yes, I've come across the solution proposed in this blog too; but I
really don't like adding 6 seconds to the boot up time. As I said
before, the boot sequence is only on for a couple of seconds; I really
don't see the point of making a longer boot in order to make the boot
experience look good eno
Following fix worked perfectly for me:
http://idyllictux.wordpress.com/2010/04/26/lucidubuntu-10-04-high-resolution-plymouth-virtual-terminal-for-atinvidia-cards-with-proprietaryrestricted-driver/
I think it's the same as the one from softpedia. Now my boot splash is in
1024x768, as this was the h
I reverted the duplicate status change which I previously made. This bug
may be related to Bug #553854.
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 551013
ubuntu-logo on VGA fb (as with nvidia or fglrx binary drivers) does not
display crisply
--
Ubuntu splashscreen big and ugly after install
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 551013 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/551013
I don't recommend using all this fixes the problem is that plymouth don't work
with kmps or what ever it's called and that is
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1469455
mybe i'll try ubuntu again in a
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 551013 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/551013
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 551013
ubuntu-logo on VGA fb (as with nvidia or fglrx binary drivers) does not
display crisply
--
Ubuntu splashscreen big and ugly after installing ATI grap
This problem occurred for me, but I found a very good solution which I
hope will be pushed upstream. The changes should be applied when
proprietary graphics drivers are enabled and reverted when proprietary
graphics are disabled. One of the steps involves choosing the ideal
resolution for the splas
I've found a partial fix here:
http://news.softpedia.com/news/How-to-Fix-the-Big-and-Ugly-Plymouth-
Logo-in-Ubuntu-10-04-140810.shtml
But it doesn't work 100%. On one computer I have a black screen and a
flashing cursor for most of the boot process; on another machine I have
to stare at a Debian
I have the same problem with an NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS. Using the
startupmanager app to set resolution only makes things worse, leaving me
with an unreadable garbled boot screen. Startupmanager does not work for
plymouth, so it has no use in Lucid...
--
Ubuntu splashscreen big and ugly after inst
he mean startupmanager you can find it in synaptic but i don't know what
is that got to do with Plymouth i too use it to set grub 2 resolution to
1280x1024 at boot with 24 bits color but i don't have the logo at all
today and i just reinstalled Ubuntu 10.04 final version today only a few
hours ago.
Chris - Can you please elaborate on the program 'start up manager'? I
tried looking for this app and wasn't able to find it.
--
Ubuntu splashscreen big and ugly after installing ATI graphics driver
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563878
You received this bug notification because you are a member
Found a temporary fix, install the start up manager and use this to set
the correct resolution for your system. Makes Plymouth look a lot
better.
--
Ubuntu splashscreen big and ugly after installing ATI graphics driver
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563878
You received this bug notification beca
> Given the second paragraph of comment 7, can we mark this bug as fix
> released too?
No, the 16-color artwork *is* the "big and ugly" artwork.
--
Ubuntu splashscreen big and ugly after installing ATI graphics driver
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563878
You received this bug notification beca
Plymouth 0.8.2-1 (now superseded by plymouth 0.8.2-2) includes the
following update:
* Use alternate 16-color images when we have only 4bpp - bug #551013.
This uses some newly committed 16-color artwork. See bug #551013 for
further details.
Given the second paragraph of comment 7, can we mark t
I pretty well agree with that last comment. The splash-screen is hardly
a critical issue - much better concentrate on making Lucid as reliable
as possible. Of course, IKT is right that such a thing wouldn't happen
with Apple. But that's because Apple works on a relatively restricted
amount of hardw
Given that Lucid's total boot times have decreased to 9-15 seconds on
the average modern system, that the splash screen is only on screen for
a fraction of this time, and that the end-user will ultimately spend
more time indulging the eye-candy of the desktop, I think this is a very
low priority is
This is one of the things I don't understand about ubuntu quality
control, a good lot of users are going to be seeing a 16 colour 640 x
480 splash screen that looks horrific on a modern operating system, Mark
himself says he wants to compare ubuntu to os x yet you believe this
should be postponed t
While Scott has commented in the duplicate bug that the images "are what
they are", I seriously doubt that the design team realized the
implication that 16-color images for VGA framebuffer also implied a
640x480 display. While I don't think it's realistic to fix this for the
final release, I do th
I am also experiencing this after installing the proprietary nvidia
driver.
--
Ubuntu splashscreen big and ugly after installing ATI graphics driver
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563878
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
-
** Package changed: ubuntu => plymouth (Ubuntu)
--
Ubuntu splashscreen big and ugly after installing ATI graphics driver
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563878
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
I'm experiencing the same issue after installing the NVIDIA proprietary
driver.
--
Ubuntu splashscreen big and ugly after installing ATI graphics driver
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563878
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu
The Proprietary driver doesn't support the slick plymouth as good as the
open driver. I suggest that this should be a wish instead of a bug.
--
Ubuntu splashscreen big and ugly after installing ATI graphics driver
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563878
You received this bug notification because y
** Attachment added: "BootDmesg.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/44272859/BootDmesg.txt
** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/44272860/CurrentDmesg.txt
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/44272861/Dependencies.txt
** A
34 matches
Mail list logo
