All issues are adressed so I close this bugreport now.
I can't reproduce the synaptic problem, but if it is still a issue,
please open a new bugreport about it.
Cheers,
Michael
** Changed in: ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Released
--
Edgy ubuntu-desktop depends on lin
What's left with this bug? The situation in Edgy is that ubuntu-desktop
recommends linux-headers-generic, and the installer installs -generic
kernels by default; in Feisty as of today the installer also runs a
-generic kernel itself. It's not clear what else needs to be done. The
synaptic problem d
** Changed in: ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu)
Target: None => later
--
Edgy ubuntu-desktop depends on linux-headers-686
https://launchpad.net/bugs/56141
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
That sounds like a separate issue; synaptic should only do this once
--
Edgy ubuntu-desktop depends on linux-headers-686
https://launchpad.net/bugs/56141
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
I have linux-headers-generic installed but ubuntu-desktop wants to
install linux-headers-386 everytime I upgrade ubuntu-desktop. It is
'recommends' but synaptics marks it automatically for install.
Could it be set to recommend -generic | -server | -386 ? Or to recommend
linux-libc-dev?
--
Edgy u
I uplaoded ubuntu-meta and updated the seeds so that for desktop all the
linux-headers packages are recommends. I didn't touched linux-
headers-386 because it seemed there is no linux-headers-generic for
i386 (only amd64) in the archive yet.
** Changed in: ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu)
Status: Conf
Michael, this seems like a perfect test case for the recommends support
in edgy. We should a) switch the seed entry to linux-headers-generic,
and b) make it a recommends so that users can remove it if they prefer
** Changed in: ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Michael Vogt
--
** Bug 59445 has been marked a duplicate of this bug
--
Edgy ubuntu-desktop depends on linux-headers-686
https://launchpad.net/bugs/56141
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 04:33:09PM -, Ben Collins wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-08-14 at 16:09 +, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > We should standardize on a kernel which supports multiprocessor/multicore
> > systems, as they are becoming very common in desktops.
>
> I'm not saying that -686 is only mean
On Mon, 2006-08-14 at 16:09 +, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 03:55:03PM -, Ben Collins wrote:
> > I'd pretty much prefer not to standardize on -686. I'm considering
> > changing the name of -386 to -generic. Mainly because people hardly ever
> > keep -386 on their computer
On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 03:55:03PM -, Ben Collins wrote:
> I'd pretty much prefer not to standardize on -686. I'm considering
> changing the name of -386 to -generic. Mainly because people hardly ever
> keep -386 on their computer because they think -686 will work so much
> better, when that is
I'd pretty much prefer not to standardize on -686. I'm considering
changing the name of -386 to -generic. Mainly because people hardly ever
keep -386 on their computer because they think -686 will work so much
better, when that isn't the case. For Most desktop users (read, any user
with one core/cp
Probably not, but when there are alternatives, most of the time debs let
you choose which one you want.
--
Edgy ubuntu-desktop depends on linux-headers-686
https://launchpad.net/bugs/56141
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-
Kernel team: I reckon what we want is a linux-headers metapackage which
depends on linux-headers-686 | alternatives, so that users can swap in a
different kernel if they want. Then we could seed that instead of -686
explicitly.
On the other hand, is the -k7 kernel actually useful enough to justif
14 matches
Mail list logo
