This bug was fixed in the package gnu-smalltalk - 3.0.3-2ubuntu0.9.10.1
---
gnu-smalltalk (3.0.3-2ubuntu0.9.10.1) karmic-proposed; urgency=low
[ Timothy Bielawa (Shaggy) ]
* debian/patches/10_fix_ftbfs_with_bash4.diff:
- Fix broken test suite causing FTBFS (LP: #557290).
[
Built fine. Fixed.
** Tags added: verification-done
** Tags removed: verification-needed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/557290
Title:
Make gnu-smalltalk build on lucid
--
ubuntu-bu
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/karmic-proposed/gnu-smalltalk
--
Make gnu-smalltalk build on lucid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/557290
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.c
Accepted gnu-smalltalk into karmic-proposed, the package will build now
and be available in a few hours. Please test and give feedback here. See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to
enable and use -proposed. Thank you in advance!
** Changed in: gnu-smalltalk (Ubu
** Also affects: gnu-smalltalk (Ubuntu Karmic)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
Make gnu-smalltalk build on lucid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/557290
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailin
This bug was fixed in the package gnu-smalltalk - 3.0.3-2ubuntu0.10.04.1
---
gnu-smalltalk (3.0.3-2ubuntu0.10.04.1) lucid-proposed; urgency=low
[ Timothy Bielawa (Shaggy) ]
* debian/patches/10_fix_ftbfs_with_bash4.diff:
- Fix broken test suite causing FTBFS (LP: #557290).
Jean-Baptiste Lallement [2010-10-02 21:42 -]:
> The binary packages are awaiting approval in NEW queue and have not been
> published to the archive yet.
Processed now.
--
Martin Pitt| http://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Developer (www.deb
Jean,
Thanks for explaining that.
Anyway, the package finished building without any errors. It installed
fine. I could run gst fine too. The issue I had before must have been
localized to that machine.
+1
--
Make gnu-smalltalk build on lucid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/557290
You received
The binary packages are awaiting approval in NEW queue and have not been
published to the archive yet.
--
Make gnu-smalltalk build on lucid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/557290
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu
I enabled -proposed in the software sources manager but I couldn't find
this package in the mirrors for testing.
tbiel...@tbielawa-desktop:~$ sudo apt-get install gnu-smalltalk
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
E: Couldn't find package
** Tags added: verification-done
** Tags removed: verification-needed
--
Make gnu-smalltalk build on lucid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/557290
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@li
It built fine in lucid-proposed, so it's fixed. +1 from me.
--
Make gnu-smalltalk build on lucid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/557290
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/lucid-proposed/gnu-smalltalk
--
Make gnu-smalltalk build on lucid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/557290
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.co
Accepted gnu-smalltalk into lucid-proposed, the package will build now
and be available in a few hours. Please test and give feedback here. See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to
enable and use -proposed. Thank you in advance!
** Changed in: gnu-smalltalk (Ubun
** Changed in: gnu-smalltalk (Ubuntu Lucid)
Status: In Progress => Confirmed
** Changed in: gnu-smalltalk (Ubuntu Lucid)
Assignee: Artur Rona (ari-tczew) => (unassigned)
--
Make gnu-smalltalk build on lucid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/557290
You received this bug notification bec
Second bug which will be fixed in one upload is: bug 410263
--
Make gnu-smalltalk build on lucid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/557290
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu
** Changed in: gnu-smalltalk (Ubuntu Lucid)
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: gnu-smalltalk (Ubuntu Lucid)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Artur Rona (ari-tczew)
--
Make gnu-smalltalk build on lucid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/557290
You received this bug notification because y
Patch is applied in maverick, so I'm setting to fixed.
** Also affects: gnu-smalltalk (Ubuntu Maverick)
Importance: Medium
Status: Incomplete
** Changed in: gnu-smalltalk (Ubuntu Maverick)
Status: Incomplete => Fix Released
--
Make gnu-smalltalk build on lucid
https://bugs.laun
Maverick package seems to be patched upstream and it got FTBFS on amd64,
powerpc and sparc. So, I'm not sure to applying patch into lucid. Do you
have tested whether this patch fix FTBFS on amd64, powerpc and sparc for
lucid? However, current existing package in lucid has built fine on all
availabl
It seems the maverick version didn't build on many platforms either,
does that need a similar treatment? The patch looks fine for lucid SRU,
please upload. But please also apply to Maverick.
** Also affects: gnu-smalltalk (Ubuntu Lucid)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
Make gnu-sma
** Changed in: gnu-smalltalk (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
Make gnu-smalltalk build on lucid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/557290
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@li
I would have nominated this for release, as per the wiki instructions,
but lucid was not listed.
--
Make gnu-smalltalk build on lucid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/557290
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
Debdiff attached. Also corrects maintainers in control files.
** Patch added: "fix_ftbfs.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnu-smalltalk/+bug/557290/+attachment/1518726/+files/fix_ftbfs.debdiff
** Tags added: verification-needed
** Tags removed: patch-needswork
--
Make gnu-
Thanks for the patch. This is now fixed upstream and in Maverick - this
upstream change is:
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=smalltalk.git;a=commitdiff;h=3ab4dc6e8edd043ac5567f5a710f91025b5325bc
Could you create a new patch (or even better a debdiff targeted for
lucid-proposed) based on this
** Tags added: patch
--
Make gnu-smalltalk build on lucid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/557290
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/l
** Patch added: "Patch to fix the execution of testcases"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43347746/10_fix_bash40.diff
--
Make gnu-smalltalk build on lucid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/557290
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ub
26 matches
Mail list logo
