[Bug 538682] Re: New HFS+ partition not labeled correctly in partition table

2013-12-20 Thread Phillip Susi
Closing since this was fixed back in lucid. ** Changed in: parted (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/538682 Title: New HFS+ partition n

[Bug 538682] Re: New HFS+ partition not labeled correctly in partition table

2010-03-23 Thread Ralph Ulrich
Don't know if it help you. Here an output of a new mac mini / efi-gpt system: -- r...@maci:/etc# parted /dev/sda print Modell: ATA Hitachi HTS54323 (scsi) Festplatte /dev/sda: 320GB Sektorgröße (logisch/physisch): 512B/512B Partitionstabelle: gpt Anzahl Beginn EndeGröße Datei

[Bug 538682] Re: New HFS+ partition not labeled correctly in partition table

2010-03-19 Thread Azrael3000
http://ubuntuforums.org/showpost.php?p=8992191&postcount=18 didn't test it myself since I need a stable system right now. -- New HFS+ partition not labeled correctly in partition table https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/538682 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bu

[Bug 538682] Re: New HFS+ partition not labeled correctly in partition table

2010-03-19 Thread Curtis Gedak
>From a quick look at the following link it would appear that Lucid now has parted-2.2. http://packages.ubuntu.com/lucid/parted E.g., Package: parted (2.2-1ubuntu3) -- New HFS+ partition not labeled correctly in partition table https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/538682 You received this bug notifi

[Bug 538682] Re: New HFS+ partition not labeled correctly in partition table

2010-03-19 Thread Azrael3000
Apparently Lucid currently has 2.1 (where the problem still persists) since one of the dependencies hasn't been updated yet. I guess we could mark this solved then. -- New HFS+ partition not labeled correctly in partition table https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/538682 You received this bug notifica

[Bug 538682] Re: New HFS+ partition not labeled correctly in partition table

2010-03-19 Thread Curtis Gedak
In comment #1, I meant to say parted-2.2 (not 2.0). Hence if Lucid has libparted 2.2, then both parted and gparted will properly set the MSDOS partition table type code for HFS/HFS+ file systems. Azrael3000, Regarding the "mac" type partition table, I suggest that if there is a problem that it

[Bug 538682] Re: New HFS+ partition not labeled correctly in partition table

2010-03-19 Thread Azrael3000
Okay that is good news. In the thread on ubuntuforums there has been another bug reported by user coffeecat that is somewhat related. I may quote him here: Anyway, to continue... I think I've discovered another bug in Gparted. If you create a "mac" type partition table (I think that's the older Ap

[Bug 538682] Re: New HFS+ partition not labeled correctly in partition table

2010-03-18 Thread Jan Claeys
Changed the package to parted instead of gparted, and status set to confirmed (as it's known & patched by upstream). ** Package changed: gparted (Ubuntu) => parted (Ubuntu) ** Changed in: parted (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- New HFS+ partition not labeled correctly in partition ta

[Bug 538682] Re: New HFS+ partition not labeled correctly in partition table

2010-03-18 Thread Jan Claeys
Lucid currently has libparted 2.2, so it should be fixed there... (not tested myself) -- New HFS+ partition not labeled correctly in partition table https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/538682 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -

[Bug 538682] Re: New HFS+ partition not labeled correctly in partition table

2010-03-18 Thread Curtis Gedak
This problem has been fixed in the upstream parted project source code repository. The relevant git commit can be found at the following link: http://git.debian.org/?p=parted/parted.git;a=commit;h=9ffd7eb93f6027a35ff854f7518947c91c086136 This patch is included in the parted-2.0 release. -- New