[Bug 538369] Re: [upgrade] mame new upstream 0.138

2010-07-10 Thread Benjamin Drung
** Changed in: sdlmame (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- [upgrade] mame new upstream 0.138 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/538369 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-

[Bug 538369] Re: [upgrade] mame new upstream 0.138

2010-07-08 Thread Benjamin Drung
The requirement of debhelper 7.0.50 is unrelated to the quilt issue. When using 3.0 (quilt), dpkg-source applies the quilt patches after the extraction. Therefore no build dependency on quilt is required and you don't need to call quilt in debian/rules. -- [upgrade] mame new upstream 0.138 https:

[Bug 538369] Re: [upgrade] mame new upstream 0.138

2010-07-08 Thread Cesare Falco
Ok, thanks. One thing is puzzling me: I added quilt to build dependencies because of "dh clean --with quilt" failing, unable to find quilt addon. Has this been solved in debhelper 7.0.50? Cesare. -- [upgrade] mame new upstream 0.138 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/538369 You received this bug

[Bug 538369] Re: [upgrade] mame new upstream 0.138

2010-07-08 Thread Benjamin Drung
Thanks. I uploaded it with some small changes: 1. Calling dh with "--with quilt" and build depending on quilt is not required due to dpkg-source 3.0 (quilt) format. 2. The dh_override_* rules require debhelper >= 7.0.50~ 3. I updated the maintainer field with update-maintainer 4. I removed the "-

[Bug 538369] Re: [upgrade] mame new upstream 0.138

2010-07-08 Thread Cesare Falco
Ok, all points are now fixed. Here's the new .debian.tar.gz, and a build for maverick is available on PPA: https://edge.launchpad.net/~c.falco/+archive/mame/+packages Thanks for all your help, Cesare. ** Attachment added: "mame_0.138-0ubuntu1.debian.tar.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/5157

[Bug 538369] Re: [upgrade] mame new upstream 0.138

2010-07-07 Thread Benjamin Drung
Allow building for any architecture. -- [upgrade] mame new upstream 0.138 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/538369 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubun

[Bug 538369] Re: [upgrade] mame new upstream 0.138

2010-07-06 Thread Brian Murray
** Tags added: patch -- [upgrade] mame new upstream 0.138 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/538369 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/l

[Bug 538369] Re: [upgrade] mame new upstream 0.138

2010-07-06 Thread Cesare Falco
I've nearly addressed points 9-12, I'm currently stuck with point 13. Mame should build on any archs, however it has been successfully tested on Intel only; LPIA would build fine, but the resulting binary would also be unusable due to higher cpu request. Thus the restriction. I can both remove

[Bug 538369] Re: [upgrade] mame new upstream 0.138

2010-07-04 Thread Benjamin Drung
Please resubscribe ubuntu-sponsors (not ubuntu-universe-sponsors) once you have addressed these points. -- [upgrade] mame new upstream 0.138 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/538369 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubunt

[Bug 538369] Re: [upgrade] mame new upstream 0.138

2010-07-04 Thread Benjamin Drung
Thanks. 9. It would be nice to have only one entry per line (and not only a line break after 80 characters). 10. I noticed no big change in debian/rules. With dh and the override_* rules the file would be much shorter. 12. Some new lintian complains: To rename a package you should use Break & R

[Bug 538369] Re: [upgrade] mame new upstream 0.138

2010-07-04 Thread Cesare Falco
1. fixed 2. header added; already fixed by upstream maintainer in unstable release 0.138u1 3. fixed 4. patch sent upstream 5. done 6. debian/control changed/updated; also patch with typos fixes sent upstream 7. done 8. done 9. done 10. done 11. This will take time, however it's in my to-do list no

[Bug 538369] Re: [upgrade] mame new upstream 0.138

2010-06-19 Thread Benjamin Drung
1. The deprecated_gtk_macros patch failed to apply. 2. The patch didn't have a DEP-3 [1] header. Did you forward the patch to upstream? 3. -0ubuntu0 is useless in the replace field. You should use 0.136u1 instead of 0.136u1-0ubuntu0. Looking at debian/changelog it probably should be 0.136 instea

[Bug 538369] Re: [upgrade] mame new upstream 0.138

2010-06-08 Thread Cesare Falco
This is the .debian.tar.gz for the new release 0.138. To build the package you can either: - use the get-orig-source target after untarring the debian/ directory - download the .orig.tar.gz from MAME PPA, where you can also find binaries built for maverick: https://edge.launchpad.net/~c.falco

[Bug 538369] Re: [upgrade] mame new upstream 0.138

2010-06-08 Thread Cesare Falco
** Summary changed: - [upgrade] mame new upstream 0.137 + [upgrade] mame new upstream 0.138 ** Description changed: Binary package hint: sdlmame - A new upstream release of MAME is available, 0.137. + A new upstream release of MAME is available, 0.138. This replaces SDLMAME, after project